The "Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2025" mandates states to report abortion data to the CDC in order to receive Medicaid funding for family planning services, and requires the CDC to collect standardized abortion data nationwide and publish annual reports.
Joni Ernst
Senator
IA
The "Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2025" mandates that states report abortion data to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to receive Medicaid funding for family planning services. This act requires the CDC to establish a system for collecting standardized abortion data, create a standard reporting worksheet for states, and issue annual reports based on the collected data. States must report data including maternal age, gestational age, race, ethnicity, abortion method, and other variables, and certify the accuracy of their submissions. States providing false information will lose Medicaid payments for family planning services and supplies.
The "Ensuring Accurate and Complete Abortion Data Reporting Act of 2025" links federal Medicaid funding for family planning services directly to state reporting of detailed abortion data. This means states must provide specific information to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) annually or risk losing a significant chunk of their healthcare budget. The bill aims to create a standardized, nationwide system for collecting abortion statistics, moving beyond the current voluntary and often incomplete reporting.
This bill isn't messing around. To get those Medicaid dollars for family planning, states now have to hand over a comprehensive dataset to the CDC by December 31st each year, covering the previous calendar year. (So, by Dec 31, 2027, they need data for all of 2026). Section 3 of the bill directly amends the Social Security Act, making this data reporting a condition of receiving funds. The required data is extensive, as detailed in section 4, and includes things like the age, race, ethnicity, and marital status of the person receiving the abortion, the gestational age of the fetus, the method of abortion used, and even the number of prior pregnancies. Imagine a single mom in Detroit needing an abortion – her personal medical details, along with those of every other woman in a similar situation, would be compiled and analyzed at the federal level.
The immediate impact is on state health departments. They'll need to ramp up their data collection and reporting capabilities, fast. The bill mandates, per section 4, that the CDC create a "standard worksheet" for reporting, including mandatory questions on numerous variables and allowing for their cross-tabulation. This could mean a significant administrative burden, especially for states that don't currently collect all of this information. For a construction worker in California, this might not seem directly relevant. But if their state's health system faces budget cuts due to non-compliance, it could impact access to a range of healthcare services, not just those related to abortion. The bill states in section 2 that accurate data is crucial for public health. It’s also true that three states, accounting for 15 percent of women of childbearing age, don’t report any abortion data to the CDC. This bill would change that.
While the bill's stated goal (section 2) is to improve public health research and policy analysis, the level of detail required raises concerns. The data collected could, in theory, be used to track individuals or target specific demographics. The bill specifies penalties for states providing false information (section 3), but the sheer volume of data and the complexity of collection create potential for errors and inconsistencies. Furthermore, the bill mandates an annual abortion report from the CDC, published by December 30th of the third calendar year following the year covered (section 4). This delay may limit the data’s usefulness for timely policy adjustments. It's also worth noting that this bill sits alongside existing laws like HIPAA, which protects patient privacy. How these will interact in practice remains to be seen.