PolicyBrief
S. 1625
119th CongressMay 6th 2025
SHIELD Against CCP Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill establishes a Department of Homeland Security Working Group to investigate and counter threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party across immigration, economic, crime, and financial sectors.

John Cornyn
R

John Cornyn

Senator

TX

LEGISLATION

New DHS 'SHIELD' Group to Track CCP Threats: Focus on Fentanyl, IP Theft, and Immigration Exploitation

The new “SHIELD Against CCP Act” sets up a dedicated Working Group within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to focus exclusively on threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Think of it as a specialized, seven-year task force designed to connect the dots across various national security issues. The group must be established within 180 days of the law passing, complete with its own Director reporting directly to the DHS Secretary.

The Mandate: Tracking the Money and the Drugs

This isn’t just about geopolitical strategy; the bill targets issues that hit close to home, especially for those worried about the drug crisis and economic stability. The Working Group is specifically tasked with investigating four major areas where the CCP’s activities intersect with U.S. domestic life. First, they’ll look at how the CCP might be exploiting the U.S. immigration system, including identity theft and human trafficking. Second, they’re digging into economic misconduct: things like trafficking counterfeit goods, customs fraud, and the theft of U.S. intellectual property—the stuff that hurts American businesses and workers.

Crucially, the group must also examine any direct or indirect support the CCP gives to criminal groups trafficking fentanyl and its precursors. This is a clear attempt to address the source of the opioid crisis that is ravaging communities across the country. Finally, they’re tasked with tracking the financial side of these operations, specifically how Chinese Money Laundering Organizations move illicit funds back out of the U.S. (SEC. 2).

Coordination and the Real-World Impact

For most people, the biggest change here is the focus on coordination. The Working Group has to inventory all current DHS resources dedicated to these threats and identify gaps in existing policies. They are also required to share relevant threat information with state, local, tribal, and territorial partners, including the local Fusion Centers. If you're a local police chief or a state customs official, this means better intelligence on counterfeit goods or drug smuggling routes, potentially leading to more effective local enforcement.

However, whenever a new, focused enforcement group is created, questions about scope and civil liberties arise. The bill attempts to head this off by explicitly stating that all activities must respect constitutional rights, privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties, and cannot infringe on the right to free speech. They even require the group to employ at least one staff member dedicated solely to privacy compliance. This is a necessary safeguard, especially given the broad mandate to investigate “exploitation” of the immigration system, which could inadvertently lead to increased scrutiny or profiling of specific ethnic groups if not carefully managed.

Oversight and the Clock is Ticking

This group isn't meant to be permanent. It has a seven-year sunset clause, meaning it automatically shuts down unless Congress renews it. In the meantime, the Secretary of Homeland Security must submit an annual report to Congress for five years, detailing the threats and the group’s activities. A public, unclassified version of this report must be posted online, ensuring some level of transparency. The Comptroller General will also review the implementation within one year, adding another layer of oversight.

This legislation is a direct response to complex, transnational threats that impact everything from local drug crime to national economic security. The success of the SHIELD Act will depend entirely on whether this new Working Group can effectively coordinate intelligence without overstepping its bounds or infringing on the rights it’s meant to protect.