This Act mandates the creation of a public, machine-readable online subpage detailing federal disaster assistance spending by covered agencies within 30 days of each fiscal quarter's end.
James Lankford
Senator
OK
The Post-Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act mandates the creation of a centralized, publicly accessible online section dedicated to tracking federal disaster assistance spending. Federal agencies must report detailed information quarterly on all disaster aid distributed to eligible recipients, excluding individual aid. This ensures transparency by requiring machine-readable data on project locations, obligations, and status following a specified natural disaster.
When disaster strikes, federal aid pours in—but tracking where that money goes can feel like trying to follow a drop of water in a flood. The Post-Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act aims to change that by requiring federal agencies to publish detailed, searchable records of how disaster funds are spent, making the process transparent for everyone.
This bill requires the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to create a dedicated subpage on the existing federal spending transparency website. This won’t be some dusty PDF archive; the bill specifically mandates that all reported data must be machine-readable (SEC. 2), meaning it can be easily downloaded, sorted, and analyzed by the public, journalists, and watchdog groups. Think of it as a mandatory, public digital receipt for every dollar of disaster aid.
Federal agencies that give out aid—like those under the Stafford Act, the Small Business Administration (SBA), and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)—must report their spending every quarter, and they only get 30 days after the quarter ends to post the data (SEC. 2). This is a tight turnaround, especially right after a major event, but it ensures the information isn't stale.
What makes this reporting powerful is the level of detail required. Agencies can’t just report a lump sum. For every dollar spent, they must list the total amount of aid, how much was actually obligated (set aside), and a detailed breakdown of every single project or activity that received the money (SEC. 2). This includes the project name, its current completion status, and its location, right down to the ZIP Code. If a state agency gets $5 million to rebuild a specific bridge, the public will be able to search the site and see that bridge, its status, and the money allocated to it.
This level of granular data is crucial for accountability. If you’re a resident in a disaster-hit area, you’ll be able to check if the funds promised for your community’s infrastructure or housing recovery are actually being delivered and what stage the projects are in. It shifts the burden of proof onto the agencies, forcing them to show their work.
The bill defines “disaster assistance” broadly, covering everything from SBA loans and HUD community recovery grants to National Flood Insurance Program payments (SEC. 3). However, it’s important to note who the reporting tracks. The required reporting focuses on eligible recipients—which the bill explicitly defines as states, local governments, non-profits, and other organizations that receive the federal funds. It specifically excludes individual people (SEC. 3). So, while you won't see your neighbor's FEMA check listed, you will see the total amount of aid distributed to the state agency that manages those payments.
For federal agencies, this means a significant increase in administrative work. They now have a mandated, quarterly deadline to compile highly detailed, machine-readable data, which will require setting up new systems and processes. While this is a headache for their compliance teams, it’s a huge win for transparency, establishing a clear, standardized way to verify that disaster relief funds are doing what they were intended to do.