This act establishes a competitive grant program through the NSF to boost the participation and retention of women, people with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in STEM fields.
Mazie Hirono
Senator
HI
The Women and Underrepresented Minorities in STEM Booster Act of 2025 establishes a new grant program administered by the National Science Foundation. This program is designed to increase the participation and retention of women, people with disabilities, and underrepresented minorities in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields. Eligible organizations can apply for competitive funding to support activities like mentoring, internships, and outreach programs aimed at these groups. Congress has authorized $15 million annually for this initiative from fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
The “Women and Underrepresented Minorities in STEM Booster Act of 2025” is straightforward: it sets up a new, competitive grant program at the National Science Foundation (NSF) to tackle the lack of diversity in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields. The goal is to boost the participation and retention of women, people with disabilities, and various minority groups who are currently underrepresented in these high-growth sectors. Think of it as a targeted investment to make sure the next generation of engineers and coders looks more like the country we live in.
This bill authorizes $15 million every year from 2026 through 2030 for the NSF to hand out these grants. If you’re running a university program, a non-profit focused on youth development, or even a specialized industry group, you can apply for this money. But you need a solid plan. The funds are earmarked for specific activities that move the needle on diversity, like setting up robust mentoring programs that pair current STEM professionals with students, funding internships for college students, or creating outreach programs that get elementary and high school kids excited about science early on. They also cover efforts to recruit and retain faculty from these underrepresented groups, which is a key part of making sure students see people who look like them in leadership roles.
This legislation is very clear about who the grants should benefit, and the definitions are broad. “Minority” isn’t just about race and ethnicity (like Black, Hispanic, or Native American groups); it specifically includes lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (LGBTQ), and gender-nonconforming individuals. A “Person with a disability” uses the definition from the Census Bureau. The overarching term, “Underrepresented in science and engineering,” is defined as any minority group whose rate of scientists and engineers is significantly lower compared to the rate for non-Hispanic white individuals. This specificity matters because it tells institutions exactly where to focus their efforts.
For a busy parent trying to navigate their kid’s future, this bill means more opportunities for their daughters or children of color to get hands-on experience. Imagine a high school student in a rural area who previously had no access to advanced engineering concepts. A grant could fund a summer camp or an online workshop that makes that exposure possible. For a graduate student who is a woman of color, this could mean a paid internship that bridges the gap between academic research and a high-paying industry job, helping to stop the high rate of attrition often seen among these groups in STEM careers. Essentially, it creates funded pathways to help people stay in the pipeline and succeed.
While the bill lists several specific activities the money can be used for, it also gives the NSF Director the power to approve “Any other activities” that fit the goal. This is a bit of a mixed bag. On one hand, it offers necessary flexibility for the NSF to fund innovative, new programs that aren’t explicitly listed. On the other hand, this broad discretion means that how the $15 million is spent each year could depend heavily on the priorities of the current NSF leadership, which adds a layer of uncertainty. Also, since the grants are competitive, well-established institutions with excellent grant-writing teams might have an advantage over smaller, grassroots organizations that might be closer to the communities the bill aims to help.