This bill permanently codifies the pilot program allowing the Department of Veterans Affairs to use contract physicians for disability examinations.
Jerry Moran
Senator
KS
This bill permanently codifies the existing pilot program allowing the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to use contract physicians for disability examinations. It allows the VA to hire non-federal doctors to conduct these crucial medical exams for benefit applicants. The legislation also establishes requirements for these contract doctors and mandates a report to Congress on the program's impact on exam speed and cost.
This bill permanently writes into law a program that lets the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hire outside doctors—non-federal employees—to conduct medical disability examinations for veterans applying for benefits. This isn’t a new idea; it formalizes and makes permanent a pilot program that has been running for a while. The goal is straightforward: to tackle the massive backlog of disability claims by boosting the VA’s capacity to process these mandatory medical evaluations. Specifically, Section 1 gives the Under Secretary for Benefits the authority to contract these services out.
If you’re a veteran, this means your next disability exam might not be conducted by a VA doctor. The bill sets clear ground rules for these contract physicians: they must hold an unrestricted, current license and cannot be barred from practicing in any state. They also need to be the kind of professional who would be eligible to work for the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) under existing federal guidelines (Section 7402(b)). This suggests the VA is aiming for quality control, ensuring that even outsourced exams meet a certain professional standard. This is critical because the exam’s findings directly impact whether a veteran receives compensation.
Here’s the part that catches the eye: the bill dictates that the costs for these contract exams—including the doctors’ fees and related travel expenses—will initially be paid out of the funds the VA already uses for compensation and pensions. These funds are then supposed to be reimbursed from the general operating budgets for the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) and its IT systems. While the money is supposed to be put back, using compensation and pension funds as the initial bankroll creates a procedural risk. If the reimbursement process is slow or inefficient, it could potentially put a temporary squeeze on funds intended for direct veteran payouts, though the intent is clearly just to cover the administrative cost of the exam itself (Section 1).
One very practical provision in this bill addresses a common frustration point. The VA must establish a system to ensure that if a contract doctor finds new, important medical evidence during your exam, that information gets sent directly and quickly to the VA. For veterans, this is a small but vital win, ensuring that a potentially critical piece of evidence—like a newly discovered condition or a change in severity—doesn’t get lost in the shuffle between the contractor and the federal system. It mandates a formal process for handling the kind of unexpected details that often come up in a medical setting, which should help ensure claims are complete.
For the average veteran waiting on a disability decision, this bill promises faster service by increasing the sheer number of available examiners. That’s a huge potential benefit if you’re trying to stabilize your life after service. However, relying heavily on contract physicians introduces a new set of variables. Will the quality and consistency of these outsourced exams match the thoroughness of internal VA staff? The bill requires the Secretary to report back to Congress within three years on how this permanent outsourcing affects the cost, speed, and completeness of the exams. This mandated review suggests that even the lawmakers know the success of this permanent program hinges entirely on whether the increased speed comes with a hidden cost in quality or accuracy.