PolicyBrief
S. 1524
119th CongressApr 30th 2025
William S. Knudsen Defense Remobilization Act
IN COMMITTEE

The William S. Knudsen Defense Remobilization Act establishes a commission to analyze and recommend improvements to the U.S. defense industrial base, aiming to bolster national security by addressing production capacity and regulatory obstacles.

Jim Banks
R

Jim Banks

Senator

IN

LEGISLATION

New Bill Proposes $7 Million Commission to Overhaul U.S. Defense Production Strategy Within One Year

The William S. Knudsen Defense Remobilization Act is on the table, proposing the creation of a temporary, 12-member body called the William S. Knudsen Commission for American Defense-Industrial Mobilization. Its main job? To take a hard look at our country's ability to produce defense materials, especially if a major conflict kicks off, and deliver a report with recommendations to the President and Congress within a year of the bill's enactment. The commission is slated to receive $7 million for its work and will operate within the legislative branch.

Sounding the Alarm: Why a New Defense Commission?

The bill itself lays out some pretty stark reasons for this move, stating in its findings (SEC. 2) that the U.S. currently lacks the domestic industrial muscle to support its defense needs, particularly during a large-scale conflict. It points out that shortages of essentials like munitions could take years to fix, and that federal red tape often gets in the way of boosting domestic production. Think of it like this: if your car breaks down, you want the mechanic to have the parts on hand, not tell you it'll take months to get them. This commission is essentially tasked with figuring out how to make sure America's 'mechanic' – our defense industry – has what it needs, when it needs it.

The commission will be made up of 12 individuals appointed by congressional leaders, all U.S. citizens with serious know-how in areas like manufacturing, defense procurement, defense tech, or industrial policy (SEC. 3). Their to-do list is hefty: review the current defense industrial base, learn from what's happening in Ukraine, figure out what we'd actually need to produce for a major war, identify where we can make key weapon systems, and pinpoint how existing federal rules might be helping or hindering things. The ultimate goal is to recommend reforms, suggest funding levels, and propose new policies.

The Game Plan: What This Commission Will Actually Do (and When)

Once this bill becomes law, the clock starts ticking. All 12 commission members must be appointed within 45 days (SEC. 3). They'll then have to provide an interim briefing to Congress within 180 days after that appointment deadline, giving a sneak peek into their findings. The main event is the final report, which must land on the desks of the President and relevant congressional committees within one year of the Act's enactment. This report isn't just a summary; it's required to include a full-blown strategy for beefing up our industrial capacity for defense production (SEC. 3). After submitting this final report, the commission will wrap up its operations 90 days later.

To get its job done, the commission will have access to information from various federal agencies, which are required to cooperate (SEC. 3). Commission members themselves could be compensated at a rate equivalent to Level IV of the Executive Schedule, which, according to 5 U.S. Code § 5315, is a senior government pay grade (currently around $195,200 annually), though compensation is for days worked. They can also hire an Executive Director and other staff.

Open Book or Closed Session? How We'll Know What They're Up To

Here’s a detail that might make you raise an eyebrow: the commission is specifically exempt from the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), as stated in SEC. 3. Normally, FACA ensures that advisory groups like this operate with a degree of public transparency – think open meetings and publicly available records. This exemption means the Knudsen Commission won't be bound by those same rules, potentially limiting public insight into its deliberations. For folks who like to keep a close eye on how government decisions are made, this could be a point of concern.

However, the bill does state the Commission will seek advice from industry partners, manufacturing experts, state and local officials, and worker representatives through public hearings and an Industry Advisory Board (SEC. 3). So, while its internal meetings might not be subject to FACA's open-door policy, there are avenues for external input. It's a bit like a company holding some internal strategy sessions privately but then conducting focus groups to get customer feedback. The aim is to gather diverse perspectives to inform their final recommendations on how to rebuild what the bill calls an "Arsenal of Democracy," referencing William S. Knudsen's historical role in ramping up U.S. war production before World War II.