PolicyBrief
S. 1521
119th CongressApr 30th 2025
Stand with Israel Act
IN COMMITTEE

Prohibits U.S. funds from going to the United Nations or its entities if they discriminate against Israel.

James Risch
R

James Risch

Senator

ID

LEGISLATION

New 'Stand with Israel Act' Could Halt U.S. Funding to UN Over Perceived Discrimination

A new piece of legislation, titled the "Stand with Israel Act," proposes a significant change to how the U.S. contributes to the United Nations. The core idea is straightforward: if the UN or any of its affiliated bodies are deemed to be discriminating against Israel, U.S. financial contributions would stop. This isn't just pocket change; the bill specifies that no funds from the Department of State or any other Federal agency could be used for such contributions, amending the United Nations Participation Act of 1945.

The Strings Attached: What's 'Discrimination'?

So, what exactly does "discriminating against Israel" mean according to this bill? Section 2 lays it out: it includes actions like expelling Israel from the UN, downgrading its membership status, suspending its membership, or otherwise restricting Israel's ability to participate on an equal footing with other member states. This is where things get a bit murky. While the actions listed are fairly specific, the interpretation of whether a UN action constitutes one of these, or what counts as restricting participation "on par with other member states," could become a point of contention. The bill doesn't offer a deeper definition, leaving a potential gray area.

Potential Ripple Effects: From New York to Global Programs

The most immediate impact, if this bill were to pass and be invoked, would be financial. The UN and its various agencies rely on member contributions, and the U.S. is a significant donor. Cutting off these funds could hamper a wide array of UN operations, from peacekeeping missions to humanitarian aid efforts, depending on how broadly the funding prohibition is applied. This isn't just about the UN headquarters; it's about the downstream effects on programs that might rely on those U.S. dollars channeled through the UN.

Furthermore, this could shift the U.S.'s diplomatic leverage. Withholding funds is a powerful tool, but it can also mean losing a seat at the table or reducing influence within international bodies. If the U.S. pulls funding based on these conditions, it could alter its ability to shape UN policies or participate in discussions on other global issues. The act aims to protect Israel from unfair treatment, but the real-world execution and the interpretation of "discrimination" will be key to understanding its full impact on U.S. foreign policy and the international landscape.