PolicyBrief
S. 1445
119th CongressApr 10th 2025
Stop Arctic Ocean Drilling Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This Act permanently bans new and existing oil and gas leasing for drilling in the Arctic areas of the outer Continental Shelf.

Jeff Merkley
D

Jeff Merkley

Senator

OR

LEGISLATION

Permanent Arctic Drilling Ban: New Act Stops All Future Oil and Gas Leases in Sensitive Ocean Areas

The newly introduced Stop Arctic Ocean Drilling Act of 2025 is short, direct, and has one major goal: to permanently shut down oil and gas leasing in the Arctic areas of the outer Continental Shelf (OCS).

The Final Word on Arctic Leases

This bill doesn’t mess around. It explicitly forbids the Secretary of the Interior from issuing any new leases for oil, natural gas, or mineral exploration in the Arctic OCS. Even more critically, it bans the extension of any existing leases in that region. The language is designed to be airtight, stating that this prohibition applies “notwithstanding any other provision of law,” meaning it overrides any conflicting regulations or previous authorizations (SEC. 2).

Think of the OCS as the federally controlled ocean floor outside of state waters. This is where the big offshore drilling happens. By focusing on the Arctic portion, the bill aims to eliminate the risk of a catastrophic oil spill in one of the world’s most fragile and difficult-to-clean environments. For the average person, this means a significant reduction in environmental risk, but also a final closure on a potential source of domestic oil supply.

Where Exactly Is “Arctic”?

When a law bans something, the definition of where matters immensely. To avoid ambiguity, the Act doesn't create a new boundary. Instead, it uses the exact definition of “Arctic” already established in Section 112 of the Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984 (SEC. 2). This keeps things simple and ensures the ban covers the geographic areas already designated as sensitive Arctic regions under existing federal law.

This clarity is good news for policy watchers and environmental groups, as it leaves little room for industry challenges based on geographical interpretation. It’s a clean regulatory move that provides long-term certainty: no more Arctic lease sales, period.

The Real-World Trade-Offs

For most people, the immediate impact is minimal—you won't see a change at the gas pump tomorrow. However, the long-term implications are significant. The primary beneficiaries here are the Arctic ecosystem and the communities that rely on its health, as the risk of a major oil spill is removed entirely. This aligns with broader climate goals by restricting access to untapped fossil fuel reserves.

On the other side of the ledger, this bill is a definitive loss for fossil fuel extraction companies and energy sector investors who were banking on future Arctic leases. It closes the door on a revenue stream for both the industry and the federal government, which collects royalties from these leases. While that revenue loss is offset by reduced environmental liability, it means the government will need to look elsewhere for OCS leasing income. This bill is a clear policy statement prioritizing environmental protection over potential energy extraction in this specific, sensitive region.