This Act expands the Federal Home Loan Banks' mission to better support housing, farming, and small business needs by clarifying their activities, broadening eligible community lenders, increasing affordable housing funding, and tying executive compensation to mission success.
Catherine Cortez Masto
Senator
NV
The Federal Home Loan Banks' Mission Activities Act aims to strengthen the Federal Home Loan Bank System's support for housing, farming, and small business needs, particularly in underserved areas. The bill expands the tools available to Banks to assist members, clarifies existing support mechanisms like grants and subsidized financing, and ties executive compensation directly to achieving these community development goals. Furthermore, it broadens the definition of community financial institutions to include more credit unions and CDFIs, and mandates increased annual funding for the Affordable Housing Program.
The newly proposed Federal Home Loan Banks' Mission Activities Act is all about making the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system work harder for regular people, particularly when it comes to housing and community investment. Think of the FHLBs as wholesale banks for smaller financial institutions like credit unions and community banks. This bill doesn’t just tweak the rules; it essentially puts the FHLBs on a leash, making sure they prioritize their public mission over just making a profit.
One of the biggest changes is the cash commitment to affordable housing. Starting in 2025, every FHLB must contribute 30% of its previous year’s net income to its Affordable Housing Program (AHP), with a guaranteed floor of at least $200 million system-wide (Sec. 4). This is a big deal because it locks in a massive, predictable funding stream for projects that help low- and moderate-income families afford rent or buy a home. For a construction worker or a teacher trying to buy their first house, this means more capital flowing into local housing markets where supply is often tight.
Crucially, the bill also opens the door wider for smaller lenders. It expands the definition of a “community financial institution” to explicitly include credit unions and certified Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs), provided they have less than $1 billion in average assets (Sec. 3). This means that your local credit union, which likely knows your neighborhood better than a massive national bank, will have easier access to FHLB funding to offer things like small business loans or mortgages.
If you’ve ever wondered why big bank executives get paid so much, this bill is trying to change that equation for FHLBs. Under Section 5, the Director now sets executive compensation, and they must tie that pay directly to the Bank’s success in achieving its community mission. They can’t just look at balance sheets anymore; they have to check a scorecard. Did the Bank help enough smaller community financial institutions? Did they invest in enough municipal bonds? Did they successfully run affordable housing programs? If the Bank hits its mission targets, the executive pay can be higher than what a Federal Reserve Bank executive makes. If they miss, well, their pay is capped or adjusted downward. This is a clear move to align the incentives of the people running the system with the public good the system is supposed to serve.
Another significant update involves how FHLBs respond to crises. The bill grants the Director the power to temporarily suspend income targeting rules for the AHP following a major disaster, such as a hurricane or wildfire (Sec. 4). This means that if you’re displaced by a disaster, the FHLB-funded vacant rental units can be temporarily used for recovery housing, even if you technically make too much money to qualify under normal affordable housing rules. It’s a practical measure that cuts through bureaucracy when communities are hurting.
Furthermore, the bill gives FHLBs more flexibility in how they spend that mandatory housing money. After consulting with their Advisory Council, a Bank can shift up to 15% of the required AHP contribution into non-competitive grants or subsidized loans for local economic needs. This allows FHLBs to better tailor their spending to specific local needs—maybe a rural district needs more small business grants than purely rental assistance, for example. The key is making sure the money is used effectively to address the unique challenges facing their communities.