This bill establishes grants to provide free childcare for student parents, invests in the early childhood education workforce, and improves federal financial aid outreach regarding dependent care allowances.
Cory Booker
Senator
NJ
This bill aims to significantly support student parents and strengthen the early childhood education workforce through multiple avenues. It establishes a major grant program to provide free infant and toddler care for student parents at eligible institutions while simultaneously funding workforce development and ensuring fair wages for childcare staff. Furthermore, the legislation streamlines access to existing federal childcare subsidies for parents in higher education and mandates clearer communication from colleges regarding dependent care allowances in financial aid packages.
The PROSPECT Act (Preparing and Resourcing Our Student Parents and Early Childhood Teachers Act) is setting up a massive, five-year, $9 billion grant program designed to tackle two major problems at once: the high cost of infant and toddler childcare, and the low graduation rates for student parents. The core idea, laid out in Title I, is to funnel significant funding through community colleges and minority-serving institutions to provide free, high-quality childcare for up to 500,000 student parents with kids under age three, while simultaneously building up the workforce needed to staff those centers.
This isn't a one-size-fits-all plan. The $9 billion authorized through 2030 is split into four competitive grant types, all managed by the Department of Education, though you must secure a one-year planning grant first before applying for the bigger implementation grants (Sec. 113(b)).
The biggest impact comes from the Access Grants (Sec. 123). These are designed to pay for free, licensed infant and toddler care for student parents. If you’re a student parent at an eligible college, this means the cost of your childcare—whether on-campus or off-campus—could be entirely covered. Centers funded by these grants must prioritize student parents, offer flexible and drop-in care options, and provide services for free to students, provided at least 85% of those students are Pell Grant-eligible.
Next are the Impact Grants (Sec. 124), which focus on solving the supply problem. These grants are for organizations that want to boost the overall quality and availability of childcare in their area, particularly in so-called "childcare deserts." Funds can be used for things like micro-grants to help new providers start up, technical assistance for existing centers, and professional development training. This is the bill’s attempt to make sure there are enough actual childcare spots available to meet the new demand created by the Access Grants.
Finally, the Pipeline Grants (Sec. 125) are all about the people. They fund the training and education of new early childhood educators. This means colleges can use the money to start new degree programs, upgrade their on-campus centers into "lab schools" for student observation, and offer micro-grants directly to students to cover tuition or pay them during mandatory practicums. Crucially, centers receiving these grants must pay their childcare staff wages comparable to elementary educators in that state, ensuring at least a living wage (Sec. 123(b)(11)).
Beyond the grant money, the PROSPECT Act includes a crucial change to existing federal law (Title II) that affects every state. It amends the Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) program, which provides federal subsidies for low-income families. Currently, many states make it difficult for college students to qualify because they don’t count enrollment as a sufficient "work or training" activity.
Section 201 mandates that enrollment in a college or university program must now explicitly count toward the work/training requirement for CCDBG eligibility. Furthermore, states are prohibited from setting eligibility rules that are stricter than the federal minimum standards, which should stop states from creating unnecessary barriers for student parents seeking childcare assistance. This change alone could provide immediate relief to countless student parents not covered by the new grant program.
For a student parent juggling classes, a part-time job, and a toddler, the Access Grants could be a game-changer, removing the single largest barrier to graduation. The bill requires centers to continue care even if a student temporarily drops enrollment or transfers to a four-year school, providing much-needed stability (Sec. 123(b)(10)).
For the early childhood workforce, this legislation is a major win. The requirement for staff to be paid wages comparable to elementary educators is a direct effort to professionalize the field and address the notoriously low pay that leads to high turnover. If implemented correctly, the Impact and Pipeline Grants should lead to a higher supply of better-trained, better-paid childcare workers in underserved communities.
One thing to note: the entire system relies on intense data collection. The Secretary must track everything—from student persistence rates compared to non-users of the childcare (Sec. 126) to the demographics of every trainee and new childcare spot created (Sec. 124). While this ensures accountability, the success hinges on the Secretary’s commitment to rigorously enforce the annual evaluations and reporting requirements.