PolicyBrief
S. 1352
119th CongressApr 8th 2025
Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

This Act establishes federal minimum standards for collective bargaining rights for public employees, allowing states to maintain their existing laws if they meet or exceed these standards, with the Federal Labor Relations Authority overseeing compliance.

Mazie Hirono
D

Mazie Hirono

Senator

HI

LEGISLATION

Federal Labor Authority Gains Power to Oversee State Public Employee Bargaining Rights Under New Act

The “Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act of 2025” is a major overhaul of how collective bargaining works for public sector workers—think teachers, sanitation workers, and state engineers. Essentially, this bill sets a federal floor for labor rights in state and local governments, giving the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) the power to step in if a state’s current laws don’t measure up. It’s about standardizing the right to organize, bargain, and have disputes resolved across the country.

The Federal Referee Checks the State Scorecard

This bill gives the FLRA 180 days to review every state’s existing labor laws to see if they “substantially provide” the minimum bargaining rights outlined in the Act (Sec. 3). If a state’s laws are deemed insufficient, that state falls under direct federal oversight by the FLRA within two years. This is a massive shift: instead of state labor boards handling disputes, the FLRA becomes the new boss, setting rules for union elections, defining bargaining units, and settling unfair labor practice complaints.

For public employees in states with historically weak labor laws, this means guaranteed rights to organize, join a union, and have their employer recognize that union without forcing a new election every time (Sec. 3(b)). It also requires states to provide a clear path for resolving bargaining deadlocks, such as mediation or binding arbitration. For a public school teacher in a state that currently prohibits collective bargaining, this bill could mean the difference between negotiating for better classroom resources and simply accepting whatever the school board decides.

The Safety Net Exception

While the bill expands rights for most public workers, it puts a hard limit on emergency services employees and law enforcement officers. Section 5 explicitly prohibits strikes, lockouts, or any organized job action if it would “measurably disrupt” the delivery of emergency or public safety services. This means that while a city sanitation worker might gain a clearer path to strike if negotiations fail, a paramedic or police officer will still face a legal ban on walking off the job if public safety is on the line. This provision attempts to balance labor rights with the critical need for continuous public safety coverage.

Who Gets Left Out of the Deal?

It’s important to note who isn’t covered. The bill explicitly excludes supervisory employees, management employees, and confidential employees from the definition of a “Public employee” (Sec. 2). If you’re a mid-level manager at a state agency, even if you supervise only a small team, you won’t be covered by these new federal minimum standards. The bill is focused on the front-line workers, not those who set policy or have key confidential roles.

Furthermore, the FLRA can’t touch existing state laws that exempt small local governments—those with fewer than 5,000 residents or fewer than 25 employees (Sec. 7). This means if you work for a small, rural county government, your labor rights might still be determined solely by local rules, even if the state as a whole falls under federal oversight. This exception shields thousands of small municipalities from the new federal standard.

The Enforcement Hammer

If the FLRA finds a state or public employer violating the rules, they can issue an order to comply. If that order is ignored, the FLRA can take the employer to a U.S. Court of Appeals for enforcement (Sec. 4(b)). Even more interesting, if the FLRA drags its feet on a complaint for 180 days, the affected employee or union can bypass the agency and file a civil lawsuit in U.S. District Court directly against the state administrator to force compliance (Sec. 4(c)). This creates a powerful, direct path to the federal courts for resolving labor disputes, giving employees a significant tool to hold state officials accountable.