The Ruby Mountains Protection Act withdraws approximately 309,272 acres of federal land in the Ruby Mountains subdistrict of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest and approximately 39,926.10 acres of federal land within the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge from mineral leasing operations.
Catherine Cortez Masto
Senator
NV
The Ruby Mountains Protection Act withdraws approximately 309,272 acres of federal land in the Ruby Mountains subdistrict of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest and approximately 39,926.10 acres of federal land within the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge from mineral leasing operations. Any land acquired by the U.S. within these areas after the enactment of this act will also be withdrawn from mineral leasing. Exceptions are made for valid existing rights and non-commercial refuge management activities. Maps of the withdrawn areas will be available for public inspection at the Forest Service and United States Fish and Wildlife Service offices.
The Ruby Mountains Protection Act proposes a straightforward change: making significant chunks of federal land in Nevada off-limits to new mineral and geothermal leasing. Specifically, it targets roughly 309,272 acres within the Ruby Mountains subdistrict of the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest and another 39,926 acres in the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge. The core idea is to prevent future mining or energy extraction projects in these designated zones, essentially prioritizing conservation and existing uses.
This bill withdraws the specified federal lands, as detailed on official maps referenced in Sections 2 and 3, from operations under mineral and geothermal leasing laws. Think of it like zoning – these areas would no longer be open for applications to explore or develop mineral or geothermal resources. It's important to note this respects "valid existing rights," meaning any currently approved operations could potentially continue, but no new leases or claims would be permitted after the bill passes. The bill also covers any federal lands acquired within these boundaries in the future, ensuring the protection extends over time. These maps are slated to be publicly available at Forest Service and Fish and Wildlife Service offices, so anyone can see the exact boundaries.
For the land within the Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge, there's a specific carve-out mentioned in Section 3. The withdrawal doesn't prevent the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service from conducting "non-commercial refuge management activities." While not explicitly defined in the bill, this likely means tasks essential for habitat maintenance, wildlife monitoring, or facility upkeep are still allowed, provided they aren't commercial mineral extraction. This aims to ensure the agency can still manage the refuge effectively while upholding the ban on mining.
The direct effect of this legislation is clear: it shields these specific natural areas from potential environmental disruption associated with mining and geothermal development, preserving scenery, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities. For those who hike, fish, or value the ecological integrity of the Ruby Mountains and Ruby Lake, this acts as a protective measure. Conversely, companies involved in mineral or geothermal exploration lose access to nearly 350,000 acres of potential resources, impacting future development opportunities in these specific locations.