The EASE Act requires the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation to test a model improving specialty healthcare access for rural and underserved Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries using digital tools coordinated with primary care.
Markwayne Mullin
Senator
OK
The Ensuring Access to Specialty Care Everywhere (EASE) Act requires the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) to test a new model focused on improving access to specialty health services. This "Specialty Health Care Services Access Model" will utilize provider networks, often based in rural areas, to deliver coordinated specialty care to eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries living in underserved regions. The model aims to leverage digital tools to connect patients with necessary specialists through established, qualified provider networks.
The Ensuring Access to Specialty Care Everywhere Act, or the EASE Act, targets one of the toughest problems in American healthcare: getting specialist doctors to people who live far from major medical centers. Instead of just talking about it, Section 2 of this bill mandates a concrete action: the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) must launch a new pilot program called the "Specialty Health Care Services Access Model."
This model is essentially a test run to see if coordinated digital networks can bridge the geographic gap. The goal is to improve access to specialists for eligible individuals covered by Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP who live in a rural or underserved area. Think of it as a specialized telehealth system that doesn’t just connect you to a doctor, but makes sure that specialist is working directly with your local primary care provider.
The most interesting part of this bill is the strict criteria for the provider networks that will run this test. The Secretary of Health and Human Services must partner with at least one network that is a nonprofit organization (specifically a 501(c)(3)) and has a proven track record in rural and underserved areas. Critically, this network must include a minimum of 50 different types of local facilities—like Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) or Critical Access Hospitals—and at least half of those sites must be located in rural areas.
Why does this matter? Because it means the program is designed to be run by organizations already embedded in the communities that need help the most. For a Medicare beneficiary in a remote county, this could mean the difference between driving three hours to see a cardiologist or getting a consultation via secure video link right at their local clinic. It forces the use of digital tools and coordination, which is the only practical way to deliver specialty care when the nearest specialist is hundreds of miles away.
Eligibility is strictly defined: you must be enrolled in Medicare Part A or B, Medicaid, or CHIP, and you must reside in a rural or underserved area. This focus ensures the pilot program addresses the specific challenge of access disparity. However, the bill doesn't precisely define "underserved area," which leaves some room for interpretation by the Secretary when deciding who qualifies. This medium level of vagueness could affect which communities are prioritized for the model, but the overall intent is clearly focused on the most isolated populations.
While this model offers a huge potential benefit for rural patients, it creates a new competitive landscape for providers. The bill requires the Secretary to select only “one or more” networks to run this pilot. This means that specialty providers who are not part of the selected network might see fewer patients from the Medicare/Medicaid population in the pilot area, as the care is funneled through the chosen digital system.
Furthermore, while the funding is tied to existing public law provisions, implementing a complex, coordinated digital specialty care network across 50+ facilities requires significant investment. Taxpayers will bear the cost of this pilot, though the bill doesn't detail the exact dollar amount. The hope is that the long-term savings from better coordinated care and fewer emergency room visits will justify the initial investment. This EASE Act section is a clear, targeted effort to solve a major healthcare headache, provided the chosen networks can make the digital coordination work seamlessly with local primary care.