This Act mandates that federal agencies annually report detailed costs and time spent on union activities, including official time, bargaining, and use of government property.
Joni Ernst
Senator
IA
The Taxpayer-Funded Union Time Transparency Act mandates that federal agencies annually report detailed information regarding the costs and time spent on union-related activities. This includes itemizing employee time spent on official union business, negotiation costs, and the value of government property provided to labor organizations. The goal is to increase public accountability for how taxpayer resources are utilized in connection with federal labor relations.
This bill, the Taxpayer-Funded Union Time Transparency Act, mandates that every single federal agency must publicly report an incredibly granular breakdown of all costs and time related to labor union activities each year. Starting the year after it becomes law, agencies have to post these reports online by June 30th, essentially opening their books on everything from contract negotiations to who is using the breakroom for union meetings.
The core of the bill is shining a spotlight on “official time”—the time federal employees, who are also union representatives, spend on union business instead of their regular government job, which is legally authorized under existing law. The report must detail the total agency cost for this time and the exact reason it was authorized for every instance. This isn't just a high-level number; agencies must also list the job title, basic salary, bonuses, benefits cost, and total hours spent on union activity for every employee who uses official time. The goal is total transparency on how taxpayer money funds labor relations.
Think of this as an extreme government audit, but focused entirely on labor relations. Beyond employee time, agencies must report the total amount paid to employees for time spent on contract negotiations, processing grievances, and even mediation. If your agency hires an outside arbitrator to settle a dispute, that cost, including travel and lodging expenses, must be reported too.
One provision that gets particularly detailed is the reporting on agency property use. Agencies must calculate the total square footage and hours that union organizations or employees use government property—like meeting rooms or office space—for free or at a reduced rate. They then have to calculate the total dollar value of this free use, including maintenance costs, and report any money they actually collected back. The idea is to put a clear price tag on every resource the government provides to unions.
For the average federal worker, this bill doesn't change what they do day-to-day, but it drastically changes the landscape for federal agencies and union representatives. For the agencies themselves, this means a massive new administrative burden. Collecting and verifying the specific salary, bonus, and benefit costs tied to individual employees and then accurately calculating the dollar value of every square foot of office space used by the union is a huge undertaking. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) will audit these accounting practices every four years to ensure accuracy, adding another layer of oversight.
For the federal employees who serve as union representatives and use authorized official time, the impact is less about the work and more about the exposure. By mandating the public disclosure of their specific salary, bonus, and hours spent on union duties, the bill essentially singles out these employees and their compensation packages for public scrutiny. While the stated goal is transparency, this level of individualized detail could create a chilling effect, potentially discouraging employees from stepping up to represent their colleagues in legally authorized union activities, simply because they don't want their personal compensation details broadcast in an annual report.