PolicyBrief
S. 1146
119th CongressJun 18th 2026
Cameras in the Courtroom Act
AWAITING SENATE

This bill mandates that the Supreme Court allow television coverage of all its open sessions unless a majority of justices vote to block it due to due process concerns.

Richard Durbin
D

Richard Durbin

Senator

IL

LEGISLATION

Supreme Court Goes Live: New Bill Mandates Television Coverage of All Public Sessions

The Cameras in the Courtroom Act aims to pull back the velvet curtain on the nation’s highest court by requiring the Supreme Court to permit television coverage of all its open sessions. Under Section 2, the justices would no longer have the option to keep cameras out of the room by default; instead, the public would get a front-row seat to the oral arguments that shape everything from healthcare laws to property rights. For the average person who can’t exactly fly to D.C. on a Tuesday morning to stand in a blocks-long line for a seat, this means watching the legal process unfold in real-time from a phone or laptop.

The "Off" Switch and Due Process

While the bill makes broadcasting the new standard, it includes a specific safety valve. The Court can vote to block coverage in a particular case if a majority of the justices decide that televising it would violate the "due process rights" of any party involved. This is a crucial detail for anyone worried about privacy or a fair trial. For example, if a case involves highly sensitive personal information or a situation where a witness might be intimidated by a global audience, the justices can hit the kill switch. However, because "due process" is a broad legal term, there is a real question of how often the Court might use this loophole to keep controversial or high-profile debates behind closed doors.

Seeing the Gavel in Action

This change would fundamentally shift how we digest legal news. Instead of waiting for a sketch artist’s drawing or a delayed audio transcript, a small business owner could watch a commerce clause argument that might affect their shipping regulations, or a tech worker could stream a patent case while on lunch. By amending Title 28 of the U.S. Code, the bill treats the Supreme Court more like other branches of government that already broadcast their proceedings. The goal is transparency, but the real-world impact depends on whether the justices embrace the spotlight or use their majority vote to keep the most impactful cases off the air.