PolicyBrief
S. 114
119th CongressJan 16th 2025
CLEAR Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The CLEAR Act of 2025 aims to enhance cooperation between federal, state, and local law enforcement in the enforcement of immigration laws, including providing financial assistance, increasing detention space, and offering training and immunity to state and local officers. It also mandates the sharing of information on immigration violators and ensures federal custody of unlawfully present aliens apprehended by state or local law enforcement.

Marsha Blackburn
R

Marsha Blackburn

Senator

TN

LEGISLATION

CLEAR Act 2025: Deputizing Local Cops for Immigration Enforcement, Threatening Funding for Non-Compliance

The CLEAR Act of 2025 aims to turn local and state law enforcement into an extension of federal immigration agencies. It's a big shift, pushing for a level of cooperation that could significantly impact communities across the country, and it uses funding as both a carrot and a stick.

Deputizing Local Law Enforcement

This bill, officially titled the Clear Law Enforcement for Criminal Alien Removal Act, gives state and local law enforcement the green light – and strong encouragement – to actively participate in enforcing federal immigration laws. This means local police, during their routine duties, are authorized to investigate, identify, apprehend, arrest, and even detain individuals suspected of being in the country illegally, then transfer them to federal custody (SEC. 3). Think of a traffic stop potentially turning into an immigration check, with local officers making the call. The bill specifically states that Congress hasn't removed this power from state and local authorities.

Dollars and Detainers

The "encouragement" comes in the form of financial pressure. States that restrict their law enforcement from assisting in immigration enforcement risk losing federal funding under section 241(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, starting one year after the bill's enactment (SEC. 4). That funding, typically used for incarcerating undocumented immigrants convicted of certain crimes, would be redistributed to states that do comply. The bill also offers grants to compliant agencies for equipment, technology, and other resources related to immigration enforcement (SEC. 7), effectively rewarding those who join the effort.

Beyond funding, the bill mandates information sharing. State and local law enforcement are required to provide DHS with detailed information on any apprehended individual believed to be in violation of immigration laws (SEC. 6). This includes everything from names and addresses to physical descriptions, encounter details, and even photos and fingerprints, if available. This information feeds into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database, specifically its Immigration Violators File (SEC. 5), creating a vast network of data on individuals, even those with limited identifying information or who haven't received formal notice of a violation.

Real-World Rollout and Potential Impacts

The bill's impact could be felt in several ways:

  • Increased Detentions: The CLEAR Act directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to build or acquire 20 new detention facilities across the country (SEC. 8). This suggests an expectation of significantly more detentions, potentially straining resources and raising concerns about detention conditions.
  • Local Law Enforcement Burden: The bill requires DHS to take custody of undocumented immigrants apprehended by state or local authorities within 48 hours of the conclusion of any local charges or immediately if there are none (SEC. 9). This could place a logistical and financial burden on local agencies, even with promised reimbursements for incarceration and transportation costs.
  • Community Trust: The expanded role of local law enforcement in immigration enforcement could erode trust between immigrant communities and the police. While the bill states that officers aren't required to report or arrest crime victims or witnesses (SEC. 4 & 6), the overall atmosphere of increased enforcement could make individuals hesitant to cooperate with law enforcement, even when they're not the target.
  • Potential for Profiling: The bill provides immunity for state and local law enforcement officers performing duties outlined in the Act, offering them similar protections as federal law enforcement (SEC. 11). While this is intended to shield officers from liability, it could also raise concerns about potential overreach or profiling, especially given the broad authority granted for investigating and apprehending individuals suspected of immigration violations.
  • Mandatory Data Sharing: Mandatory data sharing could lead to civil rights violations and impact a large number of people. (SEC. 5 & 6)

Bigger Picture

The CLEAR Act represents a significant push towards greater federal-state cooperation in immigration enforcement. It builds upon existing programs like the Institutional Removal Program (SEC. 12), which focuses on removing criminal aliens from prisons, and expands them. The bill also emphasizes training for state and local law enforcement, providing manuals, guides, and online resources to facilitate their involvement in immigration enforcement (SEC. 10). Ultimately, the CLEAR Act seeks to create a more unified and aggressive approach to immigration enforcement, with potentially far-reaching consequences for both immigrant communities and the relationship between local law enforcement and the populations they serve.