The "Cellphone Jamming Reform Act of 2025" allows state and federal correctional facilities to operate jamming systems within their housing facilities to disrupt contraband wireless devices, under certain restrictions and with specific consultations and notifications.
Tom Cotton
Senator
AR
The Cellphone Jamming Reform Act of 2025 allows state and federal correctional facilities to use jamming systems that interfere with wireless communications to or from contraband devices within the facility. The jamming system's operation must be limited to the housing facilities, and the state is responsible for funding the entire cost if a state correctional facility operates the system. Before implementing the system, correctional facilities must consult with local law enforcement and public safety officials and notify the Director of the Bureau of Prisons about its operation. This act limits the FCC's authority regarding jamming systems in correctional facilities.
This bill, the "Cellphone Jamming Reform Act of 2025," gives state and federal correctional facilities the go-ahead to install and operate "jamming systems." Think of these as devices designed specifically to block or interfere with wireless signals, like those used by cell phones. The idea, according to Section 2, is to stop communication from contraband devices within the prison walls. However, the bill limits the use of these jammers strictly to the housing areas of the facility.
Before flipping the switch, prisons need to talk it over with local law enforcement and public safety officials. If it's a state-run facility doing the jamming, the state has to pick up the entire tab for the system. Importantly, this legislation also limits the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) authority when it comes to these specific jamming systems used in prisons.
The main goal here is pretty clear: cut down on illegal cell phone use by inmates, which authorities say fuels crime both inside and outside prison walls. That could mean enhanced security within facilities. But blocking signals isn't a precision tool. While aimed at contraband, these systems could also interfere with legitimate communication channels. Section 2 doesn't explicitly define 'contraband devices,' leaving room for interpretation.
This raises questions about inmates' access to legal counsel or contact with family – communication often vital for maintaining ties and preparing for release. While the bill restricts jamming to housing units, ensuring the technology doesn't bleed outside these areas and affect nearby residents or emergency communications could be a practical challenge. Furthermore, reducing the FCC's oversight role means less federal scrutiny over how these powerful systems are deployed and managed within correctional settings.