This bill aims to improve the tracking of opioid overdoses and the use of overdose reversal medications through enhanced data collection tools and grants for states, local governments, and tribal entities.
Maria Cantwell
Senator
WA
The "Opioid Overdose Data Collection Enhancement Act" aims to improve the tracking of opioid overdoses by expanding data collection tools and making them more accessible. It establishes an overdose data collection program under the comprehensive opioid abuse grant program, enabling states, local governments, law enforcement coalitions, and Indian tribes to track overdose locations and the administration of overdose reversal medications. These programs must support coordinated responses and be compatible with existing data collection tools, ensuring data accessibility for various government levels and law enforcement coalitions. The Act also requires grant applicants to conduct data audits to avoid duplication and mandates consultation with relevant agencies to ensure effective implementation.
This legislation, the "Opioid Overdose Data Collection Enhancement Act," aims to get smarter about tracking opioid overdoses by funding better data tools. It amends the existing Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to create grant programs specifically for developing and using web-based and mobile-friendly platforms to monitor overdoses and the use of reversal medications like naloxone.
Think of it like this: a first responder—police, firefighter, EMT—responds to a suspected overdose. Under this program, funded by grants outlined in Section 3, they could use a mobile app right then and there to log the location and whether they administered naloxone. The goal is to build a near real-time map of both fatal and nonfatal overdoses. This isn't just about counting incidents; it's about identifying hotspots and trends as they happen, allowing public health and safety officials to react quicker and deploy resources more effectively. States, local governments, tribal governments, and even coalitions of law enforcement agencies can apply for these grants.
The bill stresses coordination. Any data collection system funded under this act needs to support joint responses from public safety, behavioral health, and public health agencies (Section 3). Critically, these new tools must be compatible with existing federal, state, tribal, and local overdose tracking systems. The data gathered isn't meant to sit in silos; it needs to be accessible across these different government levels and law enforcement coalitions. Before getting a grant, applicants also have to conduct an audit of their current data resources (Section 3). This is basically a check to make sure they aren't rebuilding something that already exists or duplicating efforts, aiming for smarter spending.
For communities struggling with the opioid crisis, this could mean faster identification of dangerous batches of drugs circulating or areas needing more prevention and treatment resources. By mandating compatibility and data sharing, the idea is to create a more unified picture, moving away from fragmented data collection. The requirement for an upfront audit aims to ensure taxpayer money is used efficiently to build tools that fill actual gaps, rather than creating redundant systems. The Attorney General is also required to consult with other agencies involved in drug control policy to ensure the program aligns with broader national efforts.