This bill prohibits the issuance of F, J, or M nonimmigrant visas to nationals of the People's Republic of China for the purpose of study or research in the United States.
Ashley Moody
Senator
FL
The Stop CCP VISAs Act of 2025 prohibits the issuance of F, J, or M nonimmigrant visas to nationals of the People's Republic of China. This measure specifically targets temporary student and research visas. The goal is to prevent individuals from entering the U.S. under these categories for study or research purposes.
The “Stop CCP VISAs Act of 2025” is a short, sharp piece of legislation that aims to put a comprehensive stop on academic and vocational exchange with citizens of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). This isn’t a subtle change; it’s a blanket prohibition that targets three major nonimmigrant visa categories—F, J, and M—specifically when the applicant is a PRC national seeking to study or conduct research in the U.S. (SEC. 2).
For anyone looking to come to the U.S. for temporary education, the F-1 visa is for academic students, the M-1 visa is for vocational students, and the J-1 visa covers exchange visitors, including researchers and scholars. If you are a citizen of the PRC, this bill says you cannot be issued any of these visas if your purpose is to take a course of study or conduct research. This means the PhD student applying to a U.S. university, the visiting professor coming for a year-long research fellowship, and the student enrolling in a specialized trade school are all equally blocked, regardless of their field of study or any security threat they might pose.
This broad restriction hits two major groups immediately. First, it completely eliminates the path for Chinese nationals seeking temporary education in the U.S., cutting off opportunities for thousands of students and researchers based solely on their nationality. Second, it delivers a substantial blow to U.S. universities and research institutions. Many academic programs, especially in STEM fields, rely heavily on international students and visiting scholars from China for tuition revenue, research capacity, and specialized expertise.
Take, for example, a major state university that relies on tuition from its international graduate students to fund its research labs. Under this bill, that funding stream from PRC nationals would dry up overnight. Or consider a U.S. company that partners with a university to host J-1 exchange researchers; those specific exchange programs involving PRC citizens would cease to exist. The bill’s title suggests the goal is national security—protecting intellectual property from “Chinese Communist Prying”—but the mechanism used is a sweeping ban that doesn't allow for individual vetting or consideration of risk, impacting everyone from the aspiring undergraduate to the senior, non-political scientist.
The immediate effect of this bill, if enacted, would be massive disruption across higher education. Universities would have to immediately cancel admissions offers and research agreements for PRC nationals. While this might be seen as protecting sensitive research, the cost is the loss of talent, diversity, and the funding that often supports domestic research and teaching assistants. It trades a targeted security approach for a blunt, national-level exclusion, raising questions about whether the national security benefit outweighs the significant damage to academic collaboration and the U.S. higher education system's global standing.