PolicyBrief
S. 1067
119th CongressMar 13th 2025
Concrete and Asphalt Innovation Act of 2025
IN COMMITTEE

The Concrete and Asphalt Innovation Act of 2025 establishes federal programs for research, demonstration, and procurement incentives to accelerate the development and domestic use of low-emissions cement, concrete, and asphalt.

Christopher Coons
D

Christopher Coons

Senator

DE

LEGISLATION

New Act Authorizes $200M for Cleaner Concrete and Asphalt Research, Incentivizes States to Buy Green

If you’ve ever sat in traffic during road construction, you know two things are true: we need concrete and asphalt, and we need a lot of it. The problem is that making these materials—especially cement—is incredibly carbon-intensive. The Concrete and Asphalt Innovation Act of 2025 is basically the federal government’s plan to fix that by throwing money and research at the problem.

This bill is a massive industrial upgrade strategy packaged as an infrastructure bill. Its main goal is to slash the embodied greenhouse gas emissions from these materials while boosting domestic production and strengthening supply chains (SEC. 3). Within 180 days of enactment, the Secretary of Energy has to launch a $200 million demonstration initiative to test new, low-emissions production methods, like carbon capture and using alternative fuels, with a focus on retrofitting existing U.S. plants. This isn’t just an academic exercise; the goal is to make these cleaner products commercially viable and cost-competitive with the traditional stuff.

The Road to Greener Infrastructure

For states and local governments, the most immediate impact comes through the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), which is offering a financial carrot to go green (SEC. 5). The FHWA will provide reimbursements to states to cover the extra cost of using low-emissions materials on highway projects. Even better, they’re offering an incentive equal to 2 percent of the total project cost whenever a state uses these approved materials, up to $15 million authorized through 2027. To qualify, a state must update its engineering standards to be performance-based, meaning they focus on how strong and durable the road is, rather than dictating the exact recipe.

This is a big deal for two groups: state transportation departments, which get help paying for cleaner materials, and manufacturers, who finally get a reliable buyer. The bill also creates an Advance Purchase Commitment Program (SEC. 6) that allows states to use federal highway funds to enter into long-term contracts to buy these innovative materials at a fixed price. This guaranteed demand helps manufacturers justify the massive investment needed to retool their facilities for cleaner production.

From Lab to Job Site

To ensure these new materials actually hold up, the bill authorizes the creation of specialized Manufacturing USA institutes (SEC. 4). These institutes will focus on testing the quality of low-emissions materials, sharing data publicly, and, crucially, developing workforce training programs. This means that as the industry shifts, there will be new programs to train the next generation of workers—from engineers to plant operators—to produce and use these cleaner materials.

This focus on training and domestic production is a smart move to minimize disruption. If you work in construction or manufacturing, this bill signals a coming shift in required skills and materials. If you’re a producer of traditional, high-emissions materials, this bill is a clear signal that the market is about to change, and you’ll need to adapt or risk being left behind by states chasing those federal incentives.

Who Sets the Rules?

Overseeing all this is a new Interagency Task Force for Concrete and Asphalt Innovation (SEC. 7), made up of members from five key federal agencies (Energy, Transportation, Defense, GSA, and NIST). Their job is to coordinate the strategy, recommend engineering standards, and report back to Congress every two years. However, the Secretary of Energy has significant power here, including the authority to define the “Baseline embodied greenhouse gas emissions” and approve any “other technologies” for emission reduction (SEC. 2). While this flexibility allows the program to adapt to new tech, it also gives the Secretary broad discretion in setting the rules of the game, which could influence which technologies get prioritized for funding and adoption.