This Act prohibits the Small Business Administration from providing financial assistance to small businesses or their associates following a final conviction for fraud related to covered federal loans or grants.
Todd Young
Senator
IN
The Assisting Small Businesses Not Fraudsters Act prohibits the Small Business Administration (SBA) from providing financial assistance to individuals or businesses associated with someone finally convicted of fraud related to specific federal loans or grants. This measure aims to prevent those who have committed financial misconduct from receiving further government aid. The restrictions apply to the convicted individual and any small business concern where that person is an owner, officer, or key employee.
The aptly named Assisting Small Businesses Not Fraudsters Act is setting up some serious roadblocks for small businesses tied to past financial crimes. Essentially, this bill redraws the line on who qualifies for future Small Business Administration (SBA) financial help, making it much harder for individuals and companies with a history of fraud to tap into federal funds.
This legislation is straightforward: If an “associate” of a small business is finally convicted of fraud or making a false statement related to specific federal loans or grants, that person is permanently cut off from receiving most SBA financial assistance. Crucially, the entire small business concern is also blocked. This isn't just about the person who committed the crime; it’s about the company they work for or own.
What counts as an “associate”? The bill defines this broadly to include officers, directors, key employees, and anyone owning more than 20% of the company. It also covers any entity that is at least 20% owned or controlled by those key people. If you’re a small business owner with a 21% partner who got caught lying on a PPP loan application, your entire business could be ineligible for future disaster loans or growth financing.
This rule targets fraud specifically related to what the bill calls “covered loans or grants.” Think back to the massive federal aid rolled out during the pandemic—this includes loans made under sections 7(a)(36) and 7(a)(37) (like PPP loans) and specific COVID-19 related 7(b) loans, plus grants from the American Rescue Plan and the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses Act. If the fraud conviction stems from one of these programs, the ban kicks in.
On the one hand, this is a clear win for accountability. Taxpayers deserve assurances that federal aid programs won't continue funneling money to proven fraudsters. This rule ensures that people who abused the system during the pandemic won't be able to turn around and access other SBA programs tomorrow. The conviction must be “final,” meaning the appeals process is fully exhausted, so due process is respected.
Here’s where things get tricky for the average small business. If you own a restaurant with three partners, and one of them (owning 30%) is convicted of fraud related to a past grant, the restaurant itself is barred from most future SBA assistance. The business, even if it had nothing to do with the fraud and the other partners are innocent, could be severely limited in accessing capital needed for expansion or recovery from a disaster. This broad-brush approach could end up punishing legitimate businesses for the actions of a single partner or key employee.
There is one major exception to the ban: both the convicted individual and the associated business can still receive aid under section 7(b) of the Small Business Act. Section 7(b) primarily covers disaster loans, which is a significant carve-out. Why the exception? It might be a recognition that even businesses associated with past fraud still need help to recover from natural disasters, ensuring essential services can continue. However, it also means the prohibition isn't absolute, leaving a door open for continued federal assistance in certain circumstances.