PolicyBrief
S. 1040
119th CongressApr 3rd 2025
Drug Competition Enhancement Act
AWAITING SENATE

This Act prohibits pharmaceutical manufacturers from unfairly blocking cheaper generic or biosimilar drugs through deceptive market practices known as "product hopping."

John Cornyn
R

John Cornyn

Senator

TX

LEGISLATION

FTC Gains Power to Stop Pharma 'Product Hopping' to Clear Path for Cheaper Generics

The Drug Competition Enhancement Act is dropping a new rule into the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act designed to crack down on a specific tactic used by big pharmaceutical companies: “product hopping.” Essentially, this bill aims to stop manufacturers of brand-name drugs from playing games to prevent cheaper generic or biosimilar versions from hitting the market once they’re approved.

This isn't about stopping innovation; it’s about making sure that when a drug’s patent runs out, the promised competition actually materializes. The bill gives the FTC clear authority to intervene when a company tries to maintain a monopoly by using a slightly modified version of its original drug—a “follow-on product”—to undercut the incoming, cheaper competition.

The 'Hard Switch': When the Original Drug Vanishes

This section defines what counts as an illegal “hard switch.” Think of a hard switch as the brand-name manufacturer actively yanking the original drug off the shelves right after they know a generic is coming. This includes getting the FDA to withdraw the original drug’s approval or literally destroying the inventory, specifically to make it harder for the generic version to compete. For example, if a drug company sells their popular pill, and then suddenly replaces it with a slightly different pill (maybe a different dosage or coating) while discontinuing the original, that’s a hard switch if it’s done to block the generic. The only way out for the manufacturer is proving to the FTC that they had to take the drug off the market for reasons like patient safety or an unavoidable supply disruption (Section 2).

The 'Soft Switch': Making the Original Look Bad

This is where things get a bit more subtle, hence the term “soft switch.” This occurs when a manufacturer takes actions—short of physically removing the drug—that unfairly make the original drug look worse compared to their new follow-on product. The goal is to steer doctors and patients away from the original drug and toward the new, slightly modified version that doesn't yet have a generic competitor. For instance, if a company suddenly stops supporting the original drug with educational materials or changes its marketing to strongly imply the original is outdated or inferior, that could be a soft switch violation if it’s clearly intended to impede generic competition. Crucially, this is only illegal if the manufacturer is actively marketing and selling the follow-on product at the same time (Section 2).

What This Means for Your Wallet

For most people, this bill is all about cost. Brand-name drugs are expensive; generics and biosimilars are often dramatically cheaper. When a company successfully pulls off a product hop, they force patients and insurance companies to continue paying high prices for the new, slightly tweaked drug, delaying the savings that come with competition. This bill aims to stop that delay. If the FTC successfully uses this new authority, it should mean that when a generic is ready to launch, there will be fewer artificial barriers, leading to lower prices for consumers and payers sooner. The FTC can seek temporary orders to stop the illegal behavior and even force the company to return any profits they unjustly made from the scheme, which is called “disgorgement” (Section 2).

The Fine Print on Enforcement

While the goal is consumer savings, the “soft switch” provision introduces some gray area. The FTC will have to prove that the manufacturer’s actions were specifically aimed at impeding competition, not just part of a legitimate business strategy. This might lead to some legal wrangling over what counts as “unfairly making the original drug look worse.” However, the bill is clear that simply engaging in truthful advertising or just stopping promotional marketing for the original drug is fine. This new rule enhances the FTC’s power against unfair competition but doesn't replace existing antitrust laws, giving the agency a powerful new tool to ensure that drug competition, once earned, can actually take hold.