This act mandates the expansion of the Natural Resources Conservation Service's snow survey and water supply forecasting program to include the Northeastern United States.
Jeanne Shaheen
Senator
NH
The Snow Survey Northeast Expansion Act of 2025 mandates the expansion of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) snow survey and water supply forecasting program into the Northeastern United States. This legislation officially defines the region and requires the NRCS to begin conducting snow measurements and water supply forecasts there. The goal is to bring essential water resource data collection to this previously underserved area.
The Snow Survey Northeast Expansion Act of 2025 requires the federal government to start collecting snow data and forecasting water supply in the Northeast, a region currently underserved by this specific federal program. Specifically, this bill mandates that the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), expand its current snow survey and water supply forecasting program to cover the Northeastern United States, starting with Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and New York.
When most people think of snow surveys, they picture the West—places where mountain snowpack is the primary source of water for agriculture and cities during the summer. But the Northeast, while not facing the same desertification issues, still needs accurate water data to manage everything from municipal water systems to flood control and farming. This expansion means the NRCS will deploy its tools, like the SNOTEL system (which measures snow depth and water content), in this new region. For a farmer in upstate New York, this could mean more reliable seasonal predictions for irrigation planning; for a city water manager, it means better preparation for spring runoff and potential flooding or summer drought.
Section 2 of the bill clearly defines the initial scope, naming Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and New York as the core states for this expansion. However, the bill gives the Secretary of Agriculture the authority to determine if any other states should be included in the definition of the “Northeastern United States” for this program. This administrative flexibility is common but noteworthy; it means the Secretary has the power to unilaterally expand the program’s reach to, say, Massachusetts or Pennsylvania, without further legislative action. While this allows for quick, adaptable program growth, it also means the decision on where to spend these new federal resources will be made by an appointed official, not explicitly by Congress.
This isn't just about counting snowflakes; it’s about risk management. The data collected by the NRCS is highly standardized and used by state and local agencies to make critical decisions. When a region has better data on how much water is locked up in the snowpack, it can better anticipate spring flooding, which is a major concern for homeowners and infrastructure. Conversely, it helps predict summer water shortages, allowing towns to impose conservation measures early. The main cost, as with any federal expansion, falls to the general taxpayer footing the bill for the new equipment, personnel, and operations required to set up this monitoring network across four or more states. However, the potential benefit—reducing financial losses from floods or droughts due to better planning—is designed to offset those initial program costs.