This bill establishes a special, expedited process for the House of Representatives to consider and vote on House Resolution 997, which aims to make the House more responsive to its members.
James "Jim" McGovern
Representative
MA-2
This bill establishes a special, expedited process for the House of Representatives to consider and vote on House Resolution 997, which aims to make the House more responsive to its members. The process includes automatically adopting a specific substitute amendment if timely submitted by the ranking minority member of the Rules Committee. Debate on the resolution will be strictly limited to one hour.
This resolution establishes a special, highly restrictive process for the House of Representatives to immediately consider and vote on a specific piece of legislation known as H. Res. 997. Essentially, it’s a procedural shortcut designed to push this specific resolution through the legislative process at lightning speed. The key specifics are that no point of order can be raised against the process, debate is strictly limited to one hour, and a specific substitute amendment from the minority leadership is automatically adopted if submitted on time.
Think of the normal legislative process as a four-lane highway with speed limits, rest stops, and rules for merging. This resolution turns the process for H. Res. 997 into a one-lane, no-speed-limit toll road. By prohibiting any "point of order" against the process, the bill removes a crucial check that members use to challenge procedural violations. This is like taking away the ability to call out a foul in a basketball game—it removes the mechanism for ensuring fair play.
More importantly, the bill severely restricts debate time. The resolution mandates that the entire discussion on H. Res. 997 (as amended) will be limited to just one hour, divided equally between the majority and minority leaders. For context, major bills often get days of debate. This one-hour limit means that rank-and-file members—the people elected to represent specific districts—will likely have no time to speak, ask tough questions, or scrutinize the details of H. Res. 997. They are effectively sidelined, with the discussion controlled entirely by party leadership.
One interesting provision is the automatic adoption of a substitute amendment submitted by the ranking minority member, provided they file it at least one day before the vote. This gives the minority leadership a guaranteed win on incorporating their alternative vision into the bill. However, this is the only amendment guaranteed. The resolution explicitly bans all other motions, including demands for a “division of the question.” This latter prohibition is critical: normally, members can demand that a complex bill be broken down and voted on in separate parts. Banning this motion forces members to vote yes or no on the entire package, even if they only support some sections.
While the minority leadership gets a small win with the automatic amendment, the primary beneficiary is the majority leadership, who gain the power to push H. Res. 997 through without meaningful scrutiny or delay. For the public, this process means the substance of H. Res. 997—whatever it may be—will be debated behind closed doors and rushed through the House floor. When debate is restricted to one hour and procedural challenges are banned, the transparency of the legislative process takes a significant hit. It’s a procedural move that concentrates power in the hands of a few leaders at the expense of the deliberative process and the public's right to see a robust debate on important issues.