This resolution expresses the House's sense that the United States should aim to reduce and maintain the federal budget deficit at or below 3 percent of the Gross Domestic Product.
Bill Huizenga
Representative
MI-4
This resolution expresses the sense of the House that the United States should commit to reducing the annual federal budget deficit to 3% of GDP or less. It calls for Congress and the President to adopt fiscal policies aimed at achieving this bipartisan target by the end of fiscal year 2030. The bill also mandates recommendations for enforcement mechanisms and requires budget analyses to show how legislation impacts progress toward this goal.
This resolution is the House of Representatives formally stating that the U.S. government needs to get its financial house in order. Specifically, it sets a target: reduce the annual federal budget deficit to 3 percent of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by the end of fiscal year 2030. For context, the deficit is currently hovering around 6 percent of GDP, and the national debt is nearly $31 trillion. The big driver here isn’t just the debt itself, but the interest payments, which are projected to top $1 trillion annually—more than the entire defense budget. The goal is to hit 3% and then keep going until the budget is balanced.
When we talk about the deficit, it’s easy to tune out, but the resolution highlights a kitchen-table issue: interest. Imagine your credit card debt is so high that the minimum payment (the interest) is now bigger than your rent. That’s essentially what’s happening with the federal budget. Right now, over a trillion dollars is going just to service the debt, money that could otherwise fund infrastructure projects, education, or tax cuts. This resolution is essentially a collective promise to future taxpayers that Congress will stop letting interest payments eat the budget.
Since this is a resolution and not a law, the 3% target is aspirational—it’s the “sense of the House.” However, the bill puts teeth into the process by changing how Congress handles future spending. It requires the President to submit annual budgets that map out how to hit that 3% goal. More importantly, it mandates that the House Budget and Rules Committees must recommend specific, difficult-to-waive enforcement mechanisms within 180 days. Think of these as new procedural roadblocks, like points of order, designed to stop bills that increase the deficit. If you’re a legislator trying to pass a new spending program or a tax cut, you’re suddenly going to face a much tougher fight just to get the bill to the floor.
Perhaps the most practical change involves the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the non-partisan scorekeeper for Congress. Under this resolution, the CBO must now include a special statement in its cost estimates for major legislation, explicitly showing how that bill affects the progress toward the 3% deficit target. For example, if Congress proposes a new $100 billion highway bill, the CBO won't just say how much it costs; they'll also have to report, “This bill moves the 2030 target date back by six months.” This brings a new level of transparency and pressure, making it harder for lawmakers to hide the long-term fiscal consequences of their proposals. Furthermore, the resolution explicitly states that deficit reduction must come from tackling discretionary spending, direct spending, and revenues—meaning no more “budgetary gimmicks” like timing shifts or reclassifications to artificially hit the numbers. This focus suggests that future spending on programs—whether it's defense, social safety nets, or infrastructure—will be under intense scrutiny.