PolicyBrief
H.RES. 94
119th CongressFeb 4th 2025
Expressing support for the Nation's local public K-12 schools and condemning any actions that would defund public education or weaken or dismantle the Department of Education.
IN COMMITTEE

This resolution expresses strong support for the U.S. Department of Education and public K-12 schools, while formally opposing any efforts to defund, dismantle, or weaken federal support for public education.

Suzanne Bonamici
D

Suzanne Bonamici

Representative

OR-1

LEGISLATION

House Resolution Reaffirms Support for Public Schools and Rejects Plans to Dismantle Department of Education

This resolution is essentially a defensive line for the American public school system. It formally declares that the U.S. House of Representatives supports the Department of Education’s role in keeping K-12 schools running and opposes any moves to defund public education, move its offices, or shut the department down entirely. It explicitly states that federal money should stay in public schools rather than being diverted to private institutions through voucher programs. While it doesn't create a new tax or a new agency, it acts as a high-stakes policy roadmap that signals a commitment to the 49 million students currently sitting in public classrooms.

The Federal Safety Net for Local Schools

If you live in a small town or a high-poverty area, this resolution is talking directly to your neighborhood. It highlights how the Department of Education manages critical programs like Title I-A grants for 51,000 low-income schools and the Rural Education Achievement program. For a parent of one of the 7.5 million students with disabilities, the resolution points to IDEA grants as a non-negotiable service. By citing these specific numbers, the bill argues that the Department isn't just a building in D.C., but a financial engine that helps local districts cover costs they couldn't handle on their own. It also protects the 'Title' programs that fund everything from teacher training (Title II-A) to school safety and tech support (Title IV).

Civil Rights and the Classroom

Beyond the checkbook, the resolution focuses on the Department’s role as a referee. It emphasizes the importance of the Office for Civil Rights, which handles complaints regarding discrimination based on race, national origin, sex, and disability. For a student facing unfair treatment or a school trying to navigate Title IX regulations, this office is the primary federal resource for enforcement. The resolution warns that cutting staff or relocating these offices—which are already operating with about half the personnel they had decades ago—would effectively stall investigations and leave students without a clear path to resolve civil rights violations.

The Real-World Stakes of Reshuffling

What happens if the Department is dismantled or its duties are pushed back to the states? The resolution argues that this would trigger a domino effect of budget cuts. For a typical family, this could mean larger class sizes, fewer after-school programs, or the loss of specialized career and technical training (funded by the Perkins Act) that currently serves 8.2 million students. By rejecting the idea of shifting the entire financial burden to state and local governments, the resolution aims to prevent a scenario where a child’s quality of education is determined solely by the property tax wealth of their specific zip code.