This resolution expresses House support for Design for Recycling (DFR) initiatives that encourage manufacturers to create easily recyclable products to reduce waste and boost the U.S. economy.
J. Correa
Representative
CA-46
This resolution expresses the House of Representatives' support for Design for Recycling (DFR) initiatives. DFR encourages manufacturers to design products using maximum recyclable components to limit waste and reduce environmental impact. The bill highlights the significant economic and environmental benefits of increasing recycling and supporting the domestic recycled materials industry.
This resolution marks the House of Representatives’ formal support for “Design for Recycling” (DFR) initiatives. DFR is essentially a push to get manufacturers to build products that are easier, cheaper, and safer to recycle once you’re done with them. Think products made from already-recycled material, free of nasty chemicals that mess up the recycling process, and designed so that the different parts can actually be separated and reused in a cost-effective manner. It’s a statement of belief that we should stop making trash and start making resources.
Right now, we’re leaving a lot of money and material on the table. The findings in this resolution point out that while the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates about 75 percent of the waste Americans generate could be recycled, we’re currently only recycling about 35 percent. That’s a huge gap. In 2020 alone, Americans generated over 267 million tons of solid waste. That’s 4.9 pounds per person, per day. If you’ve ever tried to figure out if that fancy plastic clamshell container is actually recyclable, you understand why the gap exists—the stuff we buy isn't always built for a second life.
This isn't just about saving the planet; it’s about dollars and jobs. The resolution highlights that the recycled materials industry is already a major economic engine, contributing nearly $170 billion annually to the U.S. economy and supporting nearly 600,000 jobs nationwide. By encouraging DFR, the idea is to grow that sector even more, potentially creating 200,000 new jobs through additional investment in recycling infrastructure. When manufacturers use recycled materials, they also cut energy consumption by up to 90 percent compared to using virgin materials. For manufacturers, DFR means a more stable, local supply chain for raw materials.
The resolution breaks down the problem by material. Take e-waste: we generate about 6.9 million tons of old electronics, but only recycle around 25 percent. That’s a missed opportunity for recovering valuable rare earth minerals and a risk, given the hazardous chemicals like lead and mercury inside. DFR aims to fix this by making it easier to take apart and process products like old phones and laptops. For everyday consumers, this push means that the materials we put out on the curb—from glass and paper to plastics—are more likely to actually get a second life, supporting what's called the “circular economy,” where materials stay in circulation through reuse and recycling.
It’s crucial to remember that this is a resolution of support and findings. It doesn't create any new laws, mandatory regulations, or enforcement mechanisms. It doesn't force any manufacturer to change their design process. Instead, it’s the House formally saying, “We think this DFR idea is a great way forward for the economy and the environment.” While it puts the weight of Congress behind the concept, the real impact will depend on manufacturers voluntarily adopting these practices—or future legislation that makes DFR mandatory. For now, it's a strong signal about where policy makers want the manufacturing industry to head.