PolicyBrief
H.RES. 848
119th CongressOct 31st 2025
Supporting the role of the United States in helping save the lives of children and protecting the health of people in low-income countries with vaccines and immunization through Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance ("Gavi").
IN COMMITTEE

This resolution expresses strong support for the United States' continued and increased investment in Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, to save children's lives and protect global health through immunization in low-income countries.

Thomas Kean
R

Thomas Kean

Representative

NJ-7

LEGISLATION

US Resolution Backs Gavi, Citing $54 Return on Every $1 Invested in Global Vaccines

This resolution is essentially a strong, public thumbs-up from the U.S. government for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. Gavi is the global heavyweight champion of getting vaccines to kids in the world’s lowest-income countries. The core message here is that the U.S. views its investment in Gavi not just as humanitarian aid, but as a smart, strategic move for global health security and a highly efficient use of taxpayer dollars.

Since 2000, Gavi has helped immunize over 1.1 billion children, preventing an estimated 18.8 million deaths. To put that in perspective, that’s like saving the entire population of the Netherlands from childhood death. The resolution points out that for every $1 invested in Gavi-supported countries, there’s an estimated $54 return in health and economic savings. That’s a return on investment most folks only dream about in their 401(k), and it’s why the U.S. sees this as an efficient way to reduce disease threats before they ever become a global problem.

The Market-Shaping Magic

One of the most interesting parts of Gavi’s model—and one the resolution specifically highlights—is its ability to manipulate the global vaccine market for the better. By pooling demand from dozens of countries, Gavi acts like a massive bulk buyer. This market leverage has driven down the price of common vaccines by 24 percent between 2015 and 2020 and is projected to save over $900 million between 2021 and 2025. This isn’t just about saving money; it’s about making vaccine supply more reliable and encouraging more manufacturers (up from 5 in 2001 to 19 in 2023) to enter the market. This stability is good for everyone, ensuring vaccines are available when needed, whether you’re in a remote village or a major city.

Tackling the Big Threats: Malaria and System Strength

The resolution also focuses on Gavi’s forward-looking efforts, particularly in tackling the new malaria vaccine (RTS,S). Malaria remains a massive killer, claiming an estimated 580,000 lives in Africa in 2022, mostly children under five. Gavi is now allocating 18 million doses for 2023 and 2024, with plans to expand procurement to 40 million to 60 million doses annually by 2026. The data suggests this vaccine can save one life for every 200 children vaccinated. This kind of targeted, high-impact intervention is exactly what the U.S. is supporting.

Beyond the shots themselves, Gavi also strengthens the underlying health infrastructure. This includes providing essential equipment like cold chain storage—the specialized refrigeration needed to keep vaccines viable. As we saw during the pandemic, strong cold chains are critical for any mass vaccination effort. The resolution encourages the continued use of resources from the State Department and CDC to help local public health systems integrate these Gavi-supported vaccines into their routine systems, making the improvements permanent.

The Ask: Multiyear Money for Maximum Impact

Crucially, the resolution encourages the U.S. government to make multiyear funding commitments to Gavi, especially for its next strategic cycle running from 2026 to 2030. Why does this matter to the average person? Because multiyear pledges allow Gavi to plan ahead, make bigger bulk purchases, and offer better guarantees to manufacturers, which ultimately drives down costs and increases efficiency. It’s the difference between buying groceries week-to-week and signing a long-term contract with a supplier—the latter is always cheaper and more reliable. By encouraging increased and sustained investment, the U.S. is signaling that this partnership is a long-term strategy, not a one-off donation.