This bill establishes the "End Congressional Stock Trading Act," banning Members of Congress, their spouses, and dependent children from trading or owning most stocks and securities, with strict divestment timelines and penalties for violations.
Anna Luna
Representative
FL-13
This bill, H.R. 1908, establishes the "End Congressional Stock Trading Act" to prohibit Members of Congress, their spouses, and dependent children from trading or owning most stocks and securities. It mandates a strict divestment timeline for existing assets, with significant civil penalties for violations. The resolution also fast-tracks the consideration and vote on this legislation within the House of Representatives.
This resolution immediately sets up a fast-track vote on H.R. 1908, the “End Congressional Stock Trading Act,” which aims to prohibit Members of Congress, their spouses, and dependent children from owning or trading most stocks, bonds, commodities, and other securities. The bill establishes strict divestment timelines—180 days for most assets, or up to two years for complex private investments like hedge funds—and imposes serious civil penalties of up to $100,000 or 10% of the asset value for each violation. Crucially, the bill also streamlines its own passage by waiving standard procedural objections, meaning the House is ready to move this bill through the process quickly.
If this bill becomes law, it fundamentally changes how Congress members and their families manage their money. For those currently serving, the clock starts ticking the moment the bill is enacted; they must sell off prohibited assets within 180 days. The list of banned investments is long, covering individual stocks, futures, and derivatives. Think of it this way: if you’re a Member, you can’t buy shares in that tech company you just learned about in a closed-door briefing, and neither can your spouse. This is a direct attempt to eliminate the appearance—and reality—of insider trading or conflicts of interest where policy decisions might be influenced by personal financial gains. The only major exceptions are widely held index funds, U.S. Treasury securities, certain government retirement plans, and, significantly, assets held in a qualified blind trust.
For a busy professional suddenly facing a mandated fire sale of their entire investment portfolio, the qualified blind trust is the key escape route. This is a trust where the Member gives up all control and knowledge of the assets, and an independent trustee manages the investments. This provision is important because it allows Members to maintain significant wealth without requiring them to liquidate everything, but it introduces a layer of complexity and cost. However, the bill is clear: if you don’t use a blind trust, you must sell. To ease the pain of a forced sale, the bill offers a significant tax break, allowing the Member to defer capital gains taxes on the sale if they reinvest the proceeds into permitted assets within 60 days. It’s a smart incentive designed to encourage compliance.
This isn't just a slap on the wrist. If a Member or their family is caught violating the trading ban, they face a civil fine of up to $100,000 per violation. To ensure these fines hit home, the bill strictly prohibits using official office funds or campaign funds to pay them. This means the money must come directly out of the individual’s pocket, making the penalty a serious deterrent. Furthermore, the bill demands radical transparency: every Member must submit an annual certification publicly confirming they and their spouse are following all the rules. These certifications won't just sit on a shelf; they must be posted publicly online and sent to the Secretary of the Treasury, who is tasked with conducting audits and investigations. Essentially, the Treasury Department becomes the new ethics watchdog, ensuring compliance isn't just an honor system.
One of the most interesting parts of this resolution is the procedural maneuver designed to get the bill passed quickly. By waiving standard procedural objections and automatically adopting a specific amendment before debate, the House is signaling that they want a clean, fast vote on the stock trading ban. While this speeds up the process, it also limits the opportunity for extensive debate or for other Members to introduce competing amendments. For those who want this reform passed now, it’s a welcome streamlining. For those who might want to slow it down or change the terms, it limits their options to a single motion to send the bill back to the committee.