This resolution celebrates the 60th anniversary of Medicaid while directing Congress to address significant projected spending increases to ensure the program's long-term viability.
Gabe Evans
Representative
CO-8
This resolution celebrates the 60th anniversary of Medicaid while addressing significant concerns over projected spending increases. Congress commits to protecting the program from waste, fraud, and abuse to ensure its long-term viability for vulnerable populations. The bill emphasizes the ongoing partnership between federal and state governments in supporting essential healthcare access.
This Congressional resolution is essentially a birthday card for Medicaid, which is turning 60, but it comes with a sticky note attached that says, “We need to talk about your budget.” The House of Representatives is officially recognizing the program’s six decades of providing healthcare to vulnerable populations—kids, single mothers, people with disabilities, and those in deep poverty.
The real story here isn't the celebration; it’s the money. Congress is flagging a massive projected increase in Medicaid spending—an estimated $200 billion between 2025 and 2035. This isn’t a bill that changes anything right now, but it’s a clear signal that the brakes are about to be hit hard on future spending. For everyday people, this means that while Congress is committed to keeping the program alive for those who truly need it, they are actively looking for ways to shrink the cost.
The resolution commits the House to protecting Medicaid from waste, fraud, and abuse (WFA). This is the classic language of “program integrity,” and it’s something everyone can agree on—nobody wants tax dollars wasted. However, this resolution also explicitly references previous legislation, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which included “common-sense work requirements for people who are able-bodied and earning above the poverty line.” This is the crucial detail for anyone who relies on Medicaid but doesn’t fall into the deep poverty or disabled categories.
If you’re a parent working two part-time jobs that put you just slightly above the federal poverty line, or if you’re an adult receiving Medicaid who is currently able-bodied, this reference is a heads-up. While the resolution doesn’t re-establish work requirements, it lays the groundwork for future legislation that almost certainly will. The focus on cutting costs and citing past requirements suggests that the next phase of Medicaid reform will likely target those marginally qualified recipients who are considered “able-bodied” as a way to reduce that projected $200 billion expense.
This resolution is a political handshake: “We value Medicaid, but we can’t afford the current trajectory.” It reassures the most vulnerable—the children and the disabled—that their coverage is safe, while simultaneously putting the rest of the Medicaid population on notice that eligibility rules are about to get a lot stricter. When Congress starts talking about WFA and citing past work requirements in the same breath as celebrating a program, it’s a clear indication that the cost-cutting measures are coming down the pipeline soon.