PolicyBrief
H.RES. 608
119th CongressJul 23rd 2025
Recognizing the importance of the Interstate Highway System and supporting the development of an interstate through southern Ohio.
IN COMMITTEE

This resolution supports the planning and development of a new interstate highway route through southern Ohio to boost regional economic growth and connectivity.

David Taylor
R

David Taylor

Representative

OH-2

LEGISLATION

Congress Backs New Interstate in Southern Ohio to Boost Jobs and National Security Access

This Congressional Resolution is essentially a big, official nod to the idea of building a new interstate highway route through southern Ohio. It starts by reminding everyone how crucial the 46,876-mile Interstate Highway System is for moving goods, supporting trade, and national security—a system kicked off back in 1956. The main purpose here is to formally support the planning, design, and development of a new route heading south from Columbus, Ohio, specifically to bring an economic lifeline to the Appalachian region of the state.

The Road to Regional Revival

This isn’t just about making commutes faster; it’s about targeted economic development. The resolution points out that southern Ohio, particularly the Appalachian area, has struggled economically. The idea is that an interstate connection can unlock job opportunities, much like the original interstates fueled growth nationwide. For a construction worker or a small business owner in a town like Portsmouth, this could mean better access to larger markets, more job bids, and an influx of new business investment that currently bypasses the area due to poor logistics.

Connecting Defense and Energy Dots

The proposed route is strategically important. It would pass near the former Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Pike County, which is now being redeveloped for new energy businesses, including uranium enrichment—a big deal for U.S. energy independence. It also improves access to a major defense technology manufacturing site just south of Columbus. Think of it this way: better highway access means these critical national security and energy facilities can move materials, components, and personnel more efficiently. This provision directly links infrastructure spending not just to local jobs, but to national security logistics, making a compelling case for federal support.

The Real-World Trade-Offs

While this resolution is purely supportive and doesn't cut a check, it puts significant political weight behind the project, which means funding is likely to follow. For taxpayers, this is the start of a massive, long-term financial commitment. Building a new interstate is incredibly expensive, and those costs are borne by federal and state budgets. Furthermore, for private property owners along the proposed corridor, this support signals the potential for eminent domain proceedings. While the goal is regional prosperity, the immediate impact for some landowners could be the forced sale of their property to make way for the right-of-way, a tough reality that accompanies major infrastructure expansion.