PolicyBrief
H.RES. 594
119th CongressJul 17th 2025
Condemning the persecution of Christians in Muslim-majority countries.
IN COMMITTEE

This resolution formally condemns the severe, ongoing persecution of Christians in Muslim-majority countries and urges the President to prioritize their protection in U.S. foreign policy.

Riley Moore
R

Riley Moore

Representative

WV-2

LEGISLATION

Congress Demands President Prioritize Global Christian Persecution in Foreign Policy Talks

This resolution isn’t about changing laws here at home; it’s Congress sending a very loud, formal message to the White House about what they need to focus on overseas. Specifically, this bill condemns the severe, documented persecution of Christians in Muslim-majority countries and urges the President to make protecting these groups a top priority in all diplomatic discussions, especially those concerning trade and security.

The Global Reality Check

Think of this as a detailed, official catalog of human rights violations. The resolution meticulously documents instances of violence, discrimination, and legal restrictions faced by Christians across the globe. For example, it cites reports that thousands of Christians are killed annually in Nigeria and highlights how in places like Algeria, nearly all evangelical churches have reportedly been shut down. It’s a stark picture of people simply trying to practice their faith under extreme duress, whether they are Coptic Christians in Egypt struggling to build churches or converts in Iran facing arrest and imprisonment in places like Evin Prison.

What Congress Wants the President to Do

Since this is a resolution, it doesn't create new government programs or budgets. Instead, it’s a strong policy recommendation directed at the Executive Branch. The core ask is that the President must use "every diplomatic tool available" to advocate for these persecuted groups. This means that when U.S. diplomats sit down with officials from countries like Saudi Arabia (where Christians aren't allowed to worship publicly) or Pakistan (where blasphemy laws often target Christians), the safety and rights of religious minorities must be on the table. For people working in international business or diplomacy, this means religious freedom issues will likely be integrated into broader conversations about trade agreements and national security, adding a human rights layer to economic and political negotiations.

The Diplomatic Pressure Point

While the goal—protecting people from persecution—is undeniably positive, this approach introduces a few complexities. By focusing exclusively on the persecution of Christians in Muslim-majority nations, the resolution places immediate diplomatic pressure on the governments of those countries. For the U.S. foreign policy team, this could complicate relationships with key allies in the Middle East and Africa, potentially straining existing security or trade agreements if these governments feel the U.S. is overly intervening in their domestic religious affairs. The language is broad, urging the use of "every diplomatic tool," which gives the President wide latitude to decide how aggressively to push these issues, potentially leading to unpredictable outcomes in delicate international relationships. Ultimately, this resolution serves as a high-level directive, ensuring that the plight of persecuted Christians remains a central, non-negotiable issue in U.S. foreign policy moving forward.