This resolution formally supports the "Day of Tears" by encouraging the lowering of U.S. flags to half-staff annually on January 22nd to memorialize the unborn.
Andrew Clyde
Representative
GA-9
This resolution formally expresses the House of Representatives' support for the "Day of Tears" to mourn the estimated 62 million unborn lives lost since 1973. It encourages the lowering of United States flags to half-staff on January 22nd each year to honor these lives. Furthermore, the resolution urges state legislatures to pass laws affirming the sanctity of life and improving abortion data collection.
This resolution, coming from the House of Representatives, is a formal statement of position rather than a new law, but it carries a clear message and a call to action. Essentially, it supports recognizing January 22nd—the anniversary of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision—as the "Day of Tears." The resolution starts by recounting the history: the 1973 ruling that established a constitutional right to abortion, and the 2022 decision that reversed it.
The most visible action encouraged by this resolution is the lowering of the United States flag to half-staff every January 22nd. This is intended as a public act of mourning and remembrance for the "over 62,000,000 unborn children" the resolution states have perished since 1973. While Congress can’t mandate this for private citizens, this formal encouragement from the House is a significant symbolic gesture, aiming to make this date a national day of solemn recognition. For most people, this means seeing flags lowered at federal buildings and potentially at state or local facilities that choose to follow the encouragement.
Beyond the symbolism, the resolution includes a direct legislative push. It specifically encourages state legislators across the country to pass new laws that focus on two major areas. First, it urges them to affirm the "sanctity of life." Given the context of the resolution, this is a clear signal for states to consider and pass legislation that restricts or bans abortion, capitalizing on the post-Roe legal landscape. For anyone concerned about reproductive rights, this is the part of the resolution that matters most, as it’s actively advocating for further state-level restrictions.
Second, the resolution encourages states to improve the collection and reporting of detailed data about abortions. While better data collection sounds neutral, in this context, it often serves to support arguments for increased regulation and monitoring of reproductive healthcare providers. If you work in healthcare administration or public health, this could mean new reporting requirements and increased scrutiny at the state level.
Since this is a resolution and not a bill creating federal law, there is no immediate change to your daily life or federal policy. However, resolutions like this serve as powerful political statements that signal legislative intent and priorities. For groups advocating for increased abortion access, this resolution is a formal endorsement of state-level efforts to restrict those rights. For those who oppose abortion, it’s a validation of their moral position and a formal encouragement for legislative action across the 50 states. It’s a political signal flare telling state legislatures where the wind is blowing on this issue, suggesting that the fight over reproductive rights is now firmly centered on state capitols.