This resolution reaffirms the importance of U.S. leadership in promoting the safety and well-being of refugees globally while criticizing recent administrative actions that restricted refugee admissions and asylum access.
Ted Lieu
Representative
CA-36
This resolution strongly reaffirms the United States' commitment to promoting the safety and well-being of refugees globally. It criticizes recent administrative actions that suspended refugee admissions and travel bans, arguing they violate U.S. and international law. The bill calls for the immediate restoration of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program and demands federal agencies uphold due process for asylum seekers. Ultimately, it asserts that welcoming oppressed people is central to American values and legal obligations.
This resolution is Congress drawing a line in the sand regarding the global refugee crisis. It’s a formal statement that the U.S. needs to get back in the game of helping displaced people, and it directly challenges recent executive actions that shut down the process. Specifically, it calls out Executive Order 14163, which indefinitely suspended all refugee admissions, and Proclamation 10949, which implemented travel bans from 12 countries. The core message is simple: these administrative roadblocks violate U.S. values and legal obligations under the Refugee Act of 1980.
The resolution starts by laying out the scale of the problem, reminding us that World Refugee Day is June 20. According to the text, over 123 million people are currently displaced worldwide—a record high. This isn't just an international problem; it’s a humanitarian crisis that the U.S. historically leads on. The resolution points out that most refugees (73%) are hosted by poorer nations, and fewer than 1% ever get resettled in countries like ours. For context, this means that for every 100 people forced to flee their homes, less than one is ever offered a safe, permanent new start through a program like the one the U.S. runs.
For those of us juggling bills and busy schedules, why should a resolution about global refugees matter? The text makes a compelling economic case. It cites a study showing that between 2005 and 2019, refugees and asylees contributed an estimated $581 billion in total revenue to all levels of government. This isn't charity; it's an investment. When refugees are allowed to come through the rigorous vetting process, they quickly become self-sufficient workers, taxpayers, and small business owners. Cutting off the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) isn't just a moral failure; it’s an economic one that costs communities future growth and tax revenue.
The resolution demands the full restoration of asylum protections and the immediate end to the current indefinite suspension of the USRAP. It highlights that over 100,000 conditionally approved refugees are stranded, including more than 22,000 who had already passed all medical and security screenings and were ready to travel. Think of this like having a fully approved job offer, but the company suddenly decides to freeze all hiring indefinitely—except in this case, the stakes are life and death. The resolution insists that refugees and asylum seekers deserve full due process before any adverse action is taken, reinforcing the principle of non-refoulement—meaning we can't send people back to places where they face persecution.
This isn't just Congress venting; it's giving marching orders. The resolution directs the Secretaries of State, Homeland Security, and Health and Human Services, along with the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., to actively lead the global response. They are told to uphold the U.S. role in providing humanitarian aid, support groups like the UNHCR, and ensure that the U.S. meets robust refugee admission targets. This means federal agencies will be tasked with ramping up operations—processing applications, coordinating aid, and fulfilling promises made at the 2023 Global Refugee Forum, such as ensuring infrastructure is accessible for refugees with disabilities. While this resolution doesn't carry the force of law, it's a powerful political signal to the executive branch that Congress expects the refugee pipeline to be fully reopened and run with the international solidarity and due process that the U.S. has historically championed.