PolicyBrief
H.RES. 516
119th CongressJun 27th 2025
Condemning the violent June 2025 riots in Los Angeles, California.
HOUSE PASSED

This resolution formally condemns the violent June 2025 Los Angeles riots, criticizes state leadership's response, highlights the impact on essential services, and thanks law enforcement for their actions.

Young Kim
R

Young Kim

Representative

CA-40

PartyTotal VotesYesNoDid Not Vote
Democrat
212719510
Republican
220208012
LEGISLATION

Congress Condemns LA Riots, Criticizes State Leaders, and Highlights ICE Enforcement Actions

This Congressional resolution is essentially a formal statement from the House of Representatives regarding the violent riots that took place in Los Angeles in June 2025 following immigration enforcement actions. Think of it as Congress weighing in on a local crisis with a very specific message: violence is unacceptable, but leadership failed, and federal enforcement is necessary.

The Line Between Protest and Crime

First, the good news for civil liberties: the resolution explicitly recognizes the fundamental right to gather and protest peacefully. That’s foundational stuff. However, the rest of the text focuses heavily on the criminal acts that occurred, formally condemning the violence, which included arson, looting, vandalism, and assaults on federal and local law enforcement officers. We’re talking about rioters throwing Molotov cocktails and commercial-grade fireworks at police, according to the text. For the average person, this part of the resolution is a clear statement that while you can march and speak out, destroying property and attacking officers is where the line is drawn.

When Services Shut Down: The Real-World Cost

This resolution brings up a crucial point about how civil unrest impacts regular people. It notes that the violence forced the temporary closure of the Los Angeles Ambulatory Care Center, which serves veterans, resulting in over 700 canceled appointments. It also shuttered a local Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) office. If you rely on government services—whether you’re a veteran needing medical care or someone trying to access housing assistance—this highlights how quickly essential support can vanish when public order breaks down. This section serves as a reminder that the cost of these events goes way beyond broken windows.

The Political Crossfire: Who’s to Blame?

One of the most notable parts of this resolution is the direct criticism leveled at California’s state and local leadership, specifically Governor Gavin Newsom. Congress suggests that state and local officials failed to adequately contain the disorder and did not offer enough support to the overwhelmed Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). The text mentions 12 LAPD officers were injured and over 561 rioters were arrested. This isn't just about policy; it’s a public call-out that shifts blame for the chaos, suggesting a lack of political will or cooperation was the issue. For people juggling work and family in LA, this political friction could signal future issues in how local and federal agencies coordinate during emergencies.

Enforcement Focus: Immigration and Public Safety

Finally, the resolution ties the riots directly to immigration enforcement, arguing that the events underscore the need for stronger federal action. It highlights that during this period, ICE officers arrested at least 330 undocumented immigrants who had prior serious criminal convictions for offenses like murder, drug trafficking, and assault. The resolution also claims ICE officers have seen a 413% increase in assaults against them, and their families have been targeted online. By linking the condemnation of the riots with these enforcement statistics, the resolution uses the event to push a specific narrative: that the failure of local authorities to support federal enforcement puts communities at risk. While the resolution thanks law enforcement agencies across the board, it places a clear emphasis on federal immigration enforcement actions, suggesting that future policy debates will use this event as justification for increased scrutiny and enforcement efforts.