PolicyBrief
H.RES. 47
119th CongressJan 15th 2025
Concerning the National Collegiate Athletic Association policy for eligibility in women's sports.
IN COMMITTEE

Urges the NCAA to reverse its transgender athlete policy, advocating for policies that ensure biological females compete against biological females in collegiate sports. It calls for all sports governing bodies to protect women's sports.

W. Steube
R

W. Steube

Representative

FL-17

LEGISLATION

NCAA Under Fire: New Bill Demands Reversal of Transgender Athlete Policy, Cites Title IX Violations

This bill is all about drawing a hard line in college sports: it demands the NCAA revoke its current policy that allows transgender athletes to compete based on their gender identity. Specifically, it calls for barring transgender women (referred to as "transgender-identifying males") from participating in women's sports, pushing for a strict "biological sex-based policy" across all NCAA sports and divisions.

Playing by New Rules?

The core of the bill centers on two main actions: reversing the NCAA’s existing transgender athlete policy and implementing a new one based solely on "biological sex." The bill argues the current NCAA policy "discriminates against female athletes." It wants all member conferences to adopt rules where only athletes assigned female at birth can compete in women's sports. This isn't just about internal NCAA policy; the bill also calls on all U.S. sports-governing bodies to adopt similar rules, effectively aiming to create a nationwide standard based on "biological sex" at birth.

The bill directly references Title IX, the landmark legislation that prohibits sex-based discrimination in education programs that receive federal funding. It states that NCAA member institutions have an "obligation...to ensure equality in athletic programs" under Title IX. The bill's authors are essentially arguing that allowing trans women to compete violates this mandate.

Real-World Impacts: Who Wins, Who Loses?

Let's break down what this could mean in practice:

  • Cisgender Female Athletes: The bill frames this as a win for cisgender women, arguing it levels the playing field. For example, a cisgender female swimmer wouldn't compete against a transgender female swimmer. The bill frames it as a matter of fairness and safety, citing "biological differences" that create "competitive disadvantages."
  • Transgender Female Athletes: This bill would completely shut them out of women's sports. A transgender woman, regardless of her personal circumstances or medical history, would be barred from competing on a women's team. This could mean losing scholarships, competitive opportunities, and the social benefits of team membership.
  • Intersex Athletes: The bill's reliance on "biological sex" raises questions. The bill does not define the term. This leaves open the possibility that athletes with certain genetic conditions could be excluded.

The Bigger Picture

This bill is part of a much larger, and often heated, national debate about inclusion and fairness in sports. It ties directly into ongoing conversations about Title IX and its interpretation in the context of transgender rights. While the bill focuses on college sports, its call for all sports-governing bodies to adopt similar policies suggests a broader aim: to establish a nationwide standard that could affect athletes at all levels, from high school to professional leagues.