This resolution establishes expedited procedures for the House to consider and vote on joint resolutions disapproving of specific rules from the National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, and Environmental Protection Agency, while also adjusting the counting of legislative days for certain House rules.
Chip Roy
Representative
TX-21
This resolution establishes expedited procedures for the House of Representatives to consider and vote on several joint resolutions aimed at disapproving recent rules from the National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Environmental Protection Agency. It waives standard procedural hurdles to allow for quick debate and votes on overturning regulations concerning vehicle use in Glen Canyon, the listing of the Longfin Smelt, and various California vehicle emission standards. The measure also technically adjusts how the House counts legislative days for procedural purposes during a specific period later in the year.
| Party | Total Votes | Yes | No | Did Not Vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | 220 | 216 | 0 | 4 |
Democrat | 213 | 0 | 208 | 5 |
This resolution is a procedural maneuver setting up a rapid-fire series of votes in the House of Representatives. It’s essentially a legislative fast-pass that waives the usual speed bumps, like procedural objections and lengthy debate, to immediately consider several joint resolutions. The goal of these underlying resolutions is to use the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to formally reject specific rules recently issued by federal agencies, covering everything from vehicle emissions to park access.
For most bills, getting to a final vote is a slow grind involving committee hearings, amendments, and hours of floor debate. This resolution throws that process out the window for these specific measures. It waives all standard procedural hurdles, meaning no one can slow the process down with technical objections. Crucially, it limits debate time to just one hour for each joint resolution, split evenly between the two parties, before moving straight to a final vote. If you’re a busy person, this means complex policy changes—which normally take months to hash out—could be decided in a single, rushed afternoon on the House floor.
The joint resolutions being fast-tracked target major regulatory changes that affect everyday life, particularly in environmental policy. Three resolutions are aimed squarely at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules concerning California’s strict vehicle and engine emission standards. If Congress disapproves these rules, it effectively removes the federal government’s approval of California’s ability to enforce stricter standards for heavy-duty trucks, the “Advanced Clean Cars II” program, and the “Omnibus Low NOX Regulation.” For people living in areas affected by smog and air pollution, overturning these rules could slow down improvements in air quality by allowing higher emissions from new vehicles.
Beyond clean air, this process is also aimed at overturning two other significant rules. One targets a rule from the National Park Service concerning motor vehicle access in the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. If overturned, it could change how people are allowed to use vehicles in that national park, potentially opening up areas previously restricted. The other rule targets the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision to list the San Francisco Bay-Delta population segment of the Longfin Smelt as an endangered species. Overturning this listing could reduce or eliminate protections for this specific fish population, which has significant implications for water usage and environmental management in the Bay-Delta region.
This resolution is purely procedural, but its impact is anything but technical. By creating a one-hour path to overturn major regulations, it reduces the opportunity for detailed analysis and public input. If you drive a truck, run a small fleet, or rely on clean air, the outcome of these votes matters. For instance, overturning the EPA rules could lead to less stringent emission controls on new vehicles, potentially saving manufacturers money but potentially costing the public in terms of health and air quality. The core takeaway is that Congress is using a powerful procedural shortcut to potentially dismantle several key environmental and conservation rules, and they are doing it with minimal debate.