This resolution strongly supports the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms while commending President Trump for working to reverse recent Biden administration infringements on those freedoms.
Roger Williams
Representative
TX-25
This resolution strongly affirms the constitutional right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment. It criticizes recent actions by the Biden administration and federal agencies, such as the ATF, for implementing what are viewed as infringements on these freedoms. The resolution commends former President Trump for his past efforts to protect Second Amendment rights against such measures.
This resolution is a formal statement from the House of Representatives that puts its support for the Second Amendment front and center. It’s less about creating a new law and more about drawing a very clear line in the sand regarding federal gun policy. Essentially, it’s the House saying: We strongly support the right to keep and bear arms, and we think the current administration is actively trying to chip away at that right.
The resolution’s main purpose is to criticize recent actions by federal agencies under the current administration. It specifically calls out the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) for issuing rules that, in the resolution’s view, restrict Americans' rights. It also targets the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) for limiting commercial firearm exports, framing these actions as "bad-faith attacks" on gun ownership.
For the average person, this means the regulatory agencies tasked with overseeing the sale and movement of firearms are facing formal legislative pushback. If you're a legal gun owner, this resolution affirms the idea that any new regulation—even one intended for public safety—is an infringement. If you're a firearms manufacturer or exporter, this is a formal rejection of the current export limitations that might be impacting your bottom line.
On the flip side, the resolution spends significant time praising former President Trump for defending the constitutional right to own firearms and for working to reverse what it calls the current administration's "flagrant gun-control measures." This is a political statement affirming that the previous administration's approach to deregulation and non-enforcement of certain rules is the preferred policy direction.
While this resolution doesn't change any existing laws, it sets a clear expectation for future legislative and administrative action. It's a signal to the ATF and BIS that a significant portion of the House views their regulatory function regarding firearms with deep suspicion. For federal agencies, this means any future rule-making intended to enhance public safety or oversight will likely face immediate, formalized opposition and attempts at reversal, creating a high-stakes, politically charged environment for regulators.