This resolution expresses Congressional concern that retiring reliable, nonintermittent power facilities threatens U.S. electric grid reliability and supports efforts to boost domestic energy production.
Julie Fedorchak
Representative
ND
This resolution declares that the retirement of reliable, always-on power generation facilities before adequate replacements are available poses a significant threat to the stability of the U.S. electric grid. Congress expresses concern that current policies are leading to insufficient energy reserves, risking power shortages amid rising demand from sectors like AI. The resolution supports executive actions aimed at immediately boosting domestic energy production to ensure grid reliability and affordability.
This resolution is essentially Congress putting its official opinion on the record: The U.S. electric grid is in trouble, and they think they know why. This isn’t a bill that creates new laws or spends money, but it’s a powerful statement of intent that sets the stage for future energy policy changes.
The core message here is that the House of Representatives is worried about power shortages. They point to expert reports—like those from the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)—that predict major power regions across the country, from Texas to the Northeast, will have dangerously low backup power reserves by 2034. For busy people, this translates to higher risks of rolling blackouts or brownouts during extreme weather events, which is a major headache whether you’re trying to run a small business or just keep your AC on in the summer heat.
The resolution argues that the main threat to reliability is the premature retirement of “nonintermittent electric generation facilities”—think coal, natural gas, and nuclear plants that run 24/7. When these reliable, always-on plants shut down before equally dependable replacements are ready, it creates a gap. The text explicitly pins this problem on “overly strict environmental rules and federal incentives that mess with the free market,” claiming these policies are forcing reliable power sources offline too soon.
It’s not just about replacing old plants; it’s about keeping up with new demand. The resolution highlights that the power needs for things like Artificial Intelligence (AI) are expected to skyrocket, potentially consuming 12% of total U.S. electricity by 2030. When you combine that massive new demand with an already shaky grid, you get a significant challenge. For the average consumer, this means that even minor disruptions could have big consequences, potentially driving up costs and straining infrastructure that’s already maxed out.
This resolution strongly supports the President’s recent declaration of a National Energy Emergency and the subsequent Executive Order, “Unleashing American Energy.” This is where the rubber meets the road. By backing this executive action, Congress is signaling support for immediately boosting domestic energy production from all available sources—a move that heavily favors the fossil fuel and nuclear industries. While the stated goal is admirable—to ensure energy is affordable and reliable—the approach raises some flags. The focus on blaming environmental rules could pave the way for regulatory rollbacks, potentially easing restrictions on existing power plants. This could be a win for stable energy prices in the short term, but it puts environmental protections at risk, which could have long-term consequences for air quality and climate goals.
In short, this resolution is a clear directive to prioritize grid reliability and domestic energy production, even if it means slowing down the transition away from traditional power sources. If you work in energy, you’ll see this as a green light for existing baseload generators. If you’re a consumer, you should be watching closely, because this debate is about more than just policy—it’s about what you’ll pay for electricity and whether the lights stay on.