This resolution demands the President transmit unredacted documents within 14 days regarding the potentially dangerous and unaccountable use of AI by the U.S. DOGE Service that jeopardizes American private information and essential services.
Melanie Stansbury
Representative
NM-1
This resolution is an official request demanding the President transmit unredacted documents within 14 days concerning the deployment and use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by the U.S. DOGE Service since January 20, 2025. Congress seeks detailed information on the AI systems, the sensitive Federal data used to train them, and the individuals involved in their policy and implementation. The inquiry specifically targets concerns regarding privacy violations, potential misuse of data, and the legality of AI-driven decisions affecting American services and benefits.
This isn't a bill about creating a new law; it’s Congress firing off a massive subpoena, disguised as a resolution, to the President. They’re demanding that the Administration hand over specific, unredacted documents within 14 days. The target? The U.S. DOGE Service and its use of powerful Artificial Intelligence (AI) since January 20, 2025.
Congress is zeroing in on the AI systems rolled out by DOGE, particularly those potentially influenced by Elon Musk or his associates. They want the entire paper trail for these systems, specifically the official oversight documents that are supposed to protect us: the System of Records Notice and the Privacy Impact Assessment. Think of these as the government’s public promises about how they’ll use and protect your data. If these documents are missing or inadequate, it’s a huge red flag for privacy.
The inquiry gets personal fast. They are demanding to know exactly what federal data—including sensitive, personally identifiable information (PII) belonging to American citizens—was fed into these AI models. For anyone who has ever worried about their Social Security number, medical records, or other sensitive details floating around, this is the core concern. The resolution is essentially asking: Did the government use our private data to train an AI, and did they do it safely and legally?
One of the most concerning aspects of this resolution is the focus on how this AI was used for decision-making. Congress wants to see documentation naming individuals involved in planning to use AI to cut payments or reduce benefits for programs aimed at Americans. This isn't just about efficiency; it's about whether an unaccountable algorithm was deployed to make life-altering decisions for regular people relying on federal support.
They are also demanding any lists generated by the AI that identified federal expenditures, programs, or personnel slated for freezes or cuts. Furthermore, they want any internal analysis that discussed the legality of those cuts and the potential harm they might cause Americans. If you’re a veteran, a retiree, or someone receiving essential federal aid, this provision is critical—it’s checking whether the people running the AI prioritized cost-cutting over legal compliance and human impact.
The resolution also acts as a deep dive into security and transparency. Congress is demanding any reports from federal workers who raised concerns that these AI actions violated the Privacy Act or failed to meet the transparency goals of the Advancing American AI Act. This suggests there were internal whistleblowers flagging potential problems with data security and public disclosure.
Finally, they want to know exactly who accessed and managed federal data during the AI training process. This includes logs, code, and configurations for all federal IT assets accessed by DOGE employees or their associates. They are demanding proof of background checks and security clearances for every individual who touched this sensitive data. This is a crucial check on who exactly was given the keys to the federal data kingdom—a necessary step to ensure that sensitive national systems weren't handled by unvetted contractors or personnel.