The BRIDGE to Congress Resolution aims to amend House Resolution 5, eliminating the requirement that remote witness appearances at committee proceedings are only allowed at the discretion of the committee chair. This change seeks to broaden accessibility and participation in congressional hearings.
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
Representative
WA-3
The "BRIDGE to Congress Resolution" amends House rules to eliminate the requirement that remote witness appearances at committee proceedings are only allowed at the discretion of the committee chair, allowing for more flexible participation.
The House just passed the "BRIDGE to Congress Resolution," and it's all about making it easier for people to testify before congressional committees, even if they can't make it to D.C. Previously, under House Resolution 5, the committee chair had the final say on whether a witness could appear remotely. This resolution scraps that rule, opening the door for more remote testimonies.
This change is pretty straightforward: it removes the requirement that the committee chair must approve all remote witness appearances. What this means is that anyone, anywhere, can potentially provide their expertise or personal experience to Congress without the added hurdles of travel costs, scheduling conflicts, or the committee chair’s exclusive permission. The resolution aims to bring "Real Ideas, Data, and Genuine Experience" to Congress, hence the acronym BRIDGE.
Imagine a small business owner in rural Montana with valuable insights on a new agricultural bill. Or a single parent in Chicago who can speak directly to the impact of proposed changes in housing policy. Previously, these individuals might have been excluded due to the costs or logistical nightmares of traveling to Washington D.C. Now, they can participate from their homes or offices, provided the committee agrees. This shift could be a game-changer for people with disabilities, those with tight budgets, or anyone juggling work and family responsibilities.
By removing the chair's sole discretion, the House is essentially leveling the playing field. This could lead to a more diverse range of voices and perspectives in congressional hearings. This could also mean a more informed legislative process. Think of academics, researchers, or even just everyday citizens with firsthand experience of a policy's impact - their input could now be more easily included. Section 2 of the resolution is the key here, amending House Resolution 5 to eliminate the restriction on remote appearances.
Of course, there's always the flip side. While this new rule increases accessibility, there could be challenges. Technical glitches could disrupt proceedings. Witnesses might not be as easily held accountable remotely. And there are potential concerns about the security and integrity of remote testimony. However, by removing the requirement for chair approval, the resolution signals a significant step toward a more inclusive and accessible legislative process.