PolicyBrief
H.RES. 272
119th CongressMar 31st 2025
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States seeks to restore peace in Ukraine.
IN COMMITTEE

Expresses the House of Representatives' desire for the U.S. to prioritize peace in Ukraine through diplomatic efforts, limit involvement in the conflict, and focus on domestic issues.

Warren Davidson
R

Warren Davidson

Representative

OH-8

LEGISLATION

House Resolution Calls for Full U.S. Withdrawal from Ukraine War Effort, Halting All Aid and Intelligence Sharing

This House resolution outlines a significant shift in U.S. policy towards the Russia-Ukraine conflict, proposing a complete withdrawal of American involvement. It explicitly calls for stopping all U.S. spending, resources, and personnel dedicated to the war effort, aiming to 'restore peace' and 'contain the war rather than escalate it.' The resolution directs the withdrawal of all military advisors, intelligence assets, and government personnel currently participating.

Cutting Ties: The Nuts and Bolts of Disengagement

The resolution mandates a hard stop on tangible support. This means no more U.S. 'money, resources, or manpower' flowing towards the conflict. Critically, it also demands an end to all intelligence sharing – not just with the Ukrainian government, but also with 'involved European intelligence agencies,' citing concerns about leaks of U.S. intelligence. Imagine Ukrainian commanders potentially losing access to vital U.S. satellite imagery or communications intercepts mid-battle, or European allies being cut off from shared information crucial for regional security. This cessation represents a potentially drastic change in operational support and allied cooperation.

Refocusing Resources: The 'America First' Pivot

The rationale presented is clear: 'Put America first and secure our borders instead of those of far-off countries.' The resolution positions the withdrawal as a strategic redirection of national focus and resources towards domestic issues. While it notes past peace efforts were rejected, it expresses support for unspecified 'Trump administration's efforts to restore peace.' For taxpayers concerned about the billions spent on aid, this signals a potential major cut in foreign expenditure. However, this sharp pivot away from supporting Ukraine raises immediate questions about the potential consequences for Ukraine's ability to defend itself, the stability of the region, and the strength of U.S. alliances if such a policy were enacted.