PolicyBrief
H.RES. 187
119th CongressApr 9th 2025
Of inquiry requesting the President to transmit certain information to the House of Representatives referring to the termination, removal, placement on administrative leave, moved to another department of Federal employees and Inspectors General of agencies.
AWAITING HOUSE

This resolution demands the President transmit all records related to the removal, reassignment, or administrative leave of federal employees and Inspectors General since January 20, 2025, particularly those influenced by outside parties like Elon Musk or concerning DEI staff layoffs.

Kweisi Mfume
D

Kweisi Mfume

Representative

MD-7

LEGISLATION

Congress Demands White House Documents on Federal Firings, DEI Staff Layoffs, and IG Removals Within 14 Days

This resolution is Congress flexing its oversight muscle by sending a massive, 14-day deadline document request to the President. Think of it as a subpoena for the entire Executive Branch’s HR files, but with a highly specific focus on who got fired, who was laid off, and who was reassigned after January 20, 2025.

The Presidential Personnel File Deep Dive

The core of this request, found in the first section, is about tracking personnel moves—terminations, reassignments, or administrative leave—that might have been influenced by people outside the government. Specifically, Congress wants to see every email, text, meeting note, and communication related to any federal employee who was moved because of advice or recommendations from Elon Musk, anyone on a “DOGE agency team,” or any member of the “United States DOGE Service.” If you’re a federal employee who got a new boss or a pink slip after January 20th, and that decision was discussed with these external entities, your file is now part of a Congressional inquiry. This is about transparency, but it also signals a concern that non-governmental figures might be pulling the strings on who works for the government.

Layoffs and the DEI Question

Another major focus area is the fate of employees working in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) offices. The resolution zeroes in on the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and its guidance issued on January 24, 2025, regarding layoffs. Congress wants all records related to OPM’s decision on whether DEI/DEIA staff should be treated as a specific group subject to layoff notices. For the thousands of federal workers currently in these roles, this provision is significant. It directly asks the administration to show its work on how it decided who was vulnerable during potential staffing cuts, shining a light on whether these groups were specifically targeted or protected during the reduction-in-force process.

The IG Removals and the Congressional Notification Gap

Perhaps the most pointed part of this resolution concerns the firing or removal of agency Inspectors General (IGs). IGs are the internal watchdogs, and legally, the President must notify Congress before removing them. Congress is demanding all communications regarding IG removals, specifically checking for discussions involving the Executive Office of the President, OPM, OMB, and external actors like Elon Musk or the “DOGE Service.” Crucially, they want to see internal debates about whether the administration needed to tell Congress about these removals. This suggests Congress is worried the administration might be trying to bypass or delay the required notification, which is a big deal for government accountability.

Finally, the resolution casts a wide net over communications between OMB or OPM and anyone connected to the Trump Campaign, Transition Team, or Administration regarding the removal of any IG. If you’re a policy staffer, this means every email or text discussing an IG’s firing with a former transition team member is now fair game for Congressional review. The overall message is clear: Congress is using its oversight power to demand immediate answers on politically sensitive personnel decisions, putting the Executive Branch under intense pressure to disclose internal deliberations that could reveal external political influence on the federal workforce.