PolicyBrief
H.RES. 179
119th CongressMar 3rd 2025
Expressing support for the strengthening of United States-Africa partnerships in critical minerals development.
IN COMMITTEE

This bill expresses the House of Representatives' support for strengthening U.S.-Africa partnerships in critical mineral development to diversify supply chains, reduce reliance on foreign entities of concern, and promote economic growth in Africa through responsible mineral sourcing and value-added processing. It also urges the development of a 5-year strategy to support U.S. investment in African mineral projects through commercial diplomacy, financing, and technical assistance.

Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick
D

Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick

Representative

FL-20

LEGISLATION

U.S. Looks to Africa for Critical Minerals, Aims to Cut Out China: New 5-Year Strategy in the Works

Alright, so there's this new bill floating around Congress, and it's all about critical minerals – the stuff that goes into everything from your phone to electric car batteries. Basically, the House is saying, "We need to get serious about where we get these minerals, and China's got too much control."

Breaking Our China Dependence

The bill straight-up calls out "foreign entities of concern," but let's be real, they're talking about China. Right now, China dominates the supply chain for a lot of these critical minerals, and that's making the U.S. nervous. The bill points out that the U.S. was heavily reliant on imports for at least 29 critical minerals in 2023. This bill is about diversifying where the U.S. gets its critical minerals so that no single country can hold the supply hostage, jack up prices, or otherwise mess with American interests.

Africa: The New Frontier (for Minerals)

This is where Africa comes in. The bill highlights that sub-Saharan Africa has about 30% of the world's proven critical mineral reserves. The thinking is, "Hey, let's partner with African countries, help them develop their mining industries, and get those minerals flowing to the U.S."

Of the projected $180 billion to $220 billion investment in critical mineral mining between 2022 and 2030, only 10% is expected to go to Africa. This bill aims to change that. It pushes for more investment in African mining projects, and not just digging stuff up – the bill also wants to see more processing done in Africa, adding value to the local economies.

The 5-Year Plan: Diplomacy, Dollars, and Development

The bill calls for a 5-year strategy from the Secretary of State. This plan is supposed to:

  • Boost Commercial Diplomacy: Help U.S. businesses navigate the challenges of investing in African mining.
  • Provide Financing and Technical Assistance: Get money and expertise flowing to African mineral producers to boost production and processing.
  • Attract Private Investment: Use things like the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation to get American companies to invest in African mining.
  • Expand Economic Cooperation: Work with African mineral producers that play by the rules.

The Good, the Bad, and the Reality Check

Now, on paper, this sounds good. Diversifying supply chains? Good for U.S. national security. Helping African economies develop? Sounds positive. But here's the catch: mining can be messy. The bill acknowledges that "poorly regulated mining" can lead to all sorts of problems. We're talking potential environmental damage, worker exploitation, and maybe even corruption if things aren't handled right.

While the bill talks about "responsible sourcing," the details of how that will be enforced will be crucial. It's one thing to say you support responsible mining; it's another to make sure it actually happens on the ground. There's a real risk that without strong regulations and oversight, this could turn into another case of U.S. companies prioritizing profits over people and the planet. The bill pushes to transform a Memorandum of Understanding among the U.S., the Democratic Republic of Congo, and the Republic of Zambia into real investment in the electric vehicle battery sector, but how that plays out matters. The potential benefits are there, but so are the pitfalls. It all comes down to the fine print and how this whole thing is actually implemented.