PolicyBrief
H.RES. 148
119th CongressFeb 21st 2025
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (XXVI) and the harmful conflation of China's "One China Principle" and the United States "One China Policy".
IN COMMITTEE

Expresses the House's stance against China's misuse of UN Resolution 2758 to assert its claim over Taiwan, reaffirming U.S. policy, support for Taiwan's international participation, and opposition to China's pressure tactics.

Young Kim
R

Young Kim

Representative

CA-40

LEGISLATION

House Resolution Clarifies UN Stance on Taiwan, Pushes Back Against China's 'One China Principle'

This House resolution takes aim at China's long-standing efforts to isolate Taiwan on the world stage by twisting the meaning of a decades-old UN resolution. It directly challenges the PRC's (People's Republic of China) use of UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, passed back in 1971, to bolster its "One China Principle" – the idea that Taiwan is simply a part of China.

Setting the Record Straight on Resolution 2758

The resolution clarifies that Resolution 2758 only dealt with the question of who represents China at the UN – the PRC, not Taiwan. It didn't decide Taiwan's political status, nor did it endorse China's "One China Principle." Think of it like this: the UN decided who gets to sit at the "China" table, but it didn't say anything about Taiwan's right to its own table.

This is crucial because the PRC has been using 2758 to shut Taiwan out of international organizations, even going so far as to restrict access for Taiwanese citizens to UN facilities. The resolution specifically calls this out, referencing instances where Taiwanese passport holders have been denied entry, requiring PRC-issued IDs instead. This is not just some diplomatic squabble, it has real-world consequences for Taiwanese people and businesses trying to engage internationally.

U.S. "One China Policy" vs. China's "One China Principle"

The resolution is also careful to distinguish between the U.S.'s "One China Policy" and China's "One China Principle." The U.S. acknowledges the PRC's position, but it doesn't recognize China's claim over Taiwan. The U.S. insists on a peaceful resolution, stays neutral on the sovereignty question, and won't pressure Taiwan into negotiations. The resolution highlights that these positions are different from the Chinese Communist Party's version.

For example, a Taiwanese tech company trying to participate in a global standards-setting body could be blocked due to China's influence. This resolution aims to create more space for Taiwan to participate, boosting its economy and its ability to contribute to global solutions.

Pushing Back and Building Bridges

The resolution isn't just about clarifying the past; it's about shaping the future. It directly opposes China's use of its "One China Principle" to pressure other countries, including the U.S. and Taiwan. It calls for supporting Taiwan's diplomatic allies and encourages other nations to strengthen ties with Taiwan. The resolution also pushes for Taiwan's membership in international organizations where statehood isn't a requirement, and for "meaningful participation" where full membership isn't possible.

It also points out the practical benefits of engaging with Taiwan, recognizing it as a reliable partner in areas like global health and advanced manufacturing (Section 2). This isn't just about politics; it's about recognizing Taiwan's contributions to the world.

Countering the Narrative

Finally, the resolution encourages the U.S. government to work with its partners to counter China's narrative around Resolution 2758. It's a call for a coordinated effort to push back against what the resolution sees as a misrepresentation of history and a distortion of international law. It encourages other countries to make clear that their own policies are distinct from China's "One China Principle."