PolicyBrief
H.RES. 1351
119th CongressJun 9th 2026
Impeaching Eleanor Louise Ross, Judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, for high crimes and misdemeanors.
IN COMMITTEE

This bill impeaches U.S. District Judge Eleanor Louise Ross for high crimes and misdemeanors stemming from an undisclosed affair, workplace misconduct, extortion vulnerability, partisan political activity, and obstruction of a judicial investigation through false statements.

Andrew Clyde
R

Andrew Clyde

Representative

GA-9

LEGISLATION

House Moves to Impeach Federal Judge Eleanor Ross Over Claims of Secret Affairs, Office Misconduct, and False Statements

The U.S. House of Representatives has introduced a resolution to impeach Judge Eleanor Louise Ross of the Northern District of Georgia, citing a series of alleged ethical and legal breaches that sound more like a television drama than a federal court docket. The resolution charges Judge Ross with 'high crimes and misdemeanors,' focusing on an undisclosed two-year affair with a high-ranking Atlanta Police officer, inappropriate behavior in her judicial chambers, and a subsequent attempt to mislead investigators. These articles of impeachment are the first step in a process that could lead to her permanent removal from the federal bench.

Conflict of Interest in the Courtroom

According to the bill, Judge Ross maintained a secret romantic relationship with Officer Kelley Collier of the Atlanta Police Department from 2023 to 2025. This wasn't just a personal matter; the bill notes that Officer Collier was involved in criminal and civil cases litigated in the very district where Ross presided. By failing to disclose this relationship to court staff or litigating parties, Ross allegedly created a massive conflict of interest. For anyone who has ever been to court, the expectation is a level playing field. If a judge is intimately involved with a key member of the local police force while hearing cases involving that same department, the integrity of every ruling comes into question.

Conduct in Chambers and Extortion Risks

The resolution details specific instances of 'inappropriate conduct' occurring in judicial chambers during business hours. The bill alleges that Judge Ross admitted to having sexual intercourse with Officer Collier in her office, an act reportedly heard by at least three of her law clerks. Beyond the workplace environment issues, the bill points out a more serious security flaw: because both individuals were married to other people and kept the affair secret, Judge Ross became a prime target for extortion. In the world of federal law, a judge who can be blackmailed is a judge who can be compromised, posing a direct threat to the impartial administration of justice.

Political Partisanship and Investigation Roadblocks

The impeachment articles also highlight a violation of judicial neutrality. The bill claims Judge Ross attended a campaign event for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis the night before presiding over a criminal proceeding. This violates Canon 5 of the Code of Conduct, which strictly prohibits federal judges from attending political fundraisers. Perhaps most damagingly, the bill alleges that when the Chief Circuit Judge first asked about these issues in September 2025, Ross issued a flat denial, calling the claims 'outrageous.' She only recanted 11 days later after a special committee had already gathered evidence. The bill characterizes these false statements as a felony-level offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, arguing that her attempt to obstruct the investigation makes her unfit to continue serving as a guardian of the law.