This resolution streamlines House procedures for debating and voting on a bill concerning responsible policies, limiting debate time and amendment options. It also mandates the House Clerk to inform the Senate of the bill's passage.
James "Jim" McGovern
Representative
MA-2
This resolution streamlines House procedures for debating and voting on a bill concerning responsible policies (H.R. 185). It bypasses certain procedural hurdles, such as challenges to the bill's content, and includes an amendment from the Rules Committee's ranking minority member. Debate time is limited, and the Clerk is instructed to notify the Senate of the bill's passage.
H.Res. 5, a new resolution, sets the stage for how the House will handle H.R. 185, a bill focused on "responsible policies." This resolution isn't about the policies themselves—it's all about the process for debating and voting on H.R. 185. Think of it as setting the rules of engagement for this specific legislative battle.
This resolution greenlights a streamlined process for H.R. 185. It waives certain House rules that usually apply, specifically those dealing with challenges to the bill's germaneness (whether amendments are relevant) and its overall structure. Basically, it's clearing the path for a quicker, more focused debate and vote. An amendment offered by the ranking minority member of the Rules Committee is automatically considered part of the base bill, sidestepping the usual process for introducing amendments.
The resolution puts a one-hour limit on the debate, split evenly between the majority and minority leaders (or their designees). After that hour, it's voting time, with only one opportunity for a motion to recommit—meaning one chance to send the bill back to committee for changes. The bill is also considered "read," further expediting the process.
Imagine a construction project (H.R. 185) where the city council (the House) decides to use a fast-track permitting process (H.Res. 5). This means fewer public hearings, a quicker review by city staff, and a faster final decision. It doesn't guarantee the project will be approved, but it does guarantee a quicker decision, one way or the other. For a small business owner waiting on a permit, this could be a huge relief, allowing them to move forward faster. However, neighbors concerned about the project's impact might feel their voices aren't fully heard due to the limited review time. This resolution, like the fast-track permitting, aims for efficiency, but it does so by limiting some of the usual checks and balances.
Finally, H.Res. 5 instructs the House Clerk to notify the Senate within one week of H.R. 185's passage. This is a standard procedural step, but the one-week timeframe adds a sense of urgency.
While this resolution aims for speed, the limited debate time and reduced amendment opportunities could raise concerns. It's like having a shorter public comment period on a major city project - some might feel it doesn't allow for a full airing of all viewpoints. The waivers of certain procedural rules, while intended to streamline the process, could also lead to less scrutiny of the bill's details.