PolicyBrief
H.RES. 106
119th CongressFeb 4th 2025
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United Nations Security Council should immediately impose an arms embargo against the military of Burma.
IN COMMITTEE

Urges the UN Security Council to impose an arms embargo on Burma's military due to human rights violations and to ensure a transition to a democratically elected government.

Claudia Tenney
R

Claudia Tenney

Representative

NY-24

LEGISLATION

UN Security Council Urged to Impose Arms Embargo on Burma's Military: Resolution Sets Path to Democratic Transition

This House resolution is pushing for a serious global response to the ongoing crisis in Burma (Myanmar). It calls on the UN Security Council to immediately impose an arms embargo against the Burmese military, which seized power in a coup on February 1, 2021, overturning the democratically elected government and detaining its leaders. This isn't just about paperwork; it's a direct response to the military's brutal crackdown on peaceful protestors, widespread human rights abuses, and complete disregard for the 2020 election results.

Cutting Off the Arms Supply

The core of this resolution is a call for a UN arms embargo. This means stopping the flow of weapons to the Burmese military (the Tatmadaw). The resolution points directly to the military's actions, like using lethal force against pro-democracy demonstrators, shutting down the internet, and detaining everyone from government officials to students. It also highlights their long history of human rights violations against ethnic minorities, including the Rohingya, Karen, Rakhine, and Kachin.

Roadmap to Restoration

This isn't just about cutting off weapons; it's about setting a clear path back to democracy. The resolution lays out specific conditions that the military must meet before the arms embargo can be lifted. These conditions include a permanent cease-fire, the release of all detained leaders, and allowing full humanitarian access. The military is also asked to restore internet access and, most importantly, start a verifiable process to hand power back to a civilian-led, democratically elected government. Think of it like this: no weapons until these critical steps towards democracy and human rights are taken.

Real-World Impact and Potential Challenges

For the average Burmese citizen, especially those involved in pro-democracy movements and ethnic minorities facing persecution, this resolution offers a glimmer of hope. If enforced, an arms embargo could significantly weaken the military's capacity for violence, potentially saving lives. For example, a farmer in the Karen State who has been displaced by military attacks might see a reduction in violence, and a student activist in Yangon might have a better chance of protesting without facing deadly force.

However, the success of this resolution hinges on international cooperation. If even a few countries continue to supply arms to the Burmese military, the embargo's effectiveness will be limited. It's a classic global challenge: getting everyone on the same page to enforce the rules. The resolution also calls for the international community to support civilians affected by the coup, especially ethnic minorities, and to promote peace talks within Burma. This means providing aid and fostering dialogue, which are crucial for long-term stability.