PolicyBrief
H.R. 9939
119th CongressJul 23rd 2026
No AI Data Centers on Federal Lands Act
IN COMMITTEE

This bill prohibits the construction and operation of artificial intelligence data centers and their associated infrastructure on federal lands while mandating the removal of any existing facilities.

Rashida Tlaib
D

Rashida Tlaib

Representative

MI-12

LEGISLATION

No AI Data Centers on Federal Lands Act Mandates Immediate Shutdown and Removal Within 30 Days

The No AI Data Centers on Federal Lands Act is a hard-line piece of legislation designed to completely scrub artificial intelligence infrastructure from U.S. government-owned land. It doesn't just stop new construction; it forces any federal agency currently running, leasing, or building an AI data center to pull the plug immediately. The bill defines these centers specifically as facilities used for large-scale AI modeling or those with a power load over 20 megawatts that use high-density cooling systems. Once the bill hits the books, agencies have a mere 30-day window to stop operations and begin tearing everything down, including the 'associated infrastructure' like power substations, transmission lines, and water pipelines.

Eviction Notice for the Cloud

This bill effectively treats AI data centers as unwelcome tenants on public land. By prohibiting these facilities 'notwithstanding any other provision of law,' it overrides existing leases or development agreements. For the tech industry and government agencies like the Department of Defense, which often use federal land for secure or remote operations, this is a massive logistical hurdle. If you’re a contractor working on a government AI project located on a federal site, your workplace could essentially be slated for demolition in a month. The bill’s definition of 'associated infrastructure' is particularly broad, meaning it’s not just the server racks going away—it’s the dedicated power plants and pipelines built to keep them running.

The Cleanup Bill

Section 2 of the act doesn't just tell agencies to leave; it tells them to clean up the mess. Any removal must comply with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), the same law used for Superfund sites. This means agencies are on the hook for full natural resource restoration and remedial actions. For taxpayers, this could represent a significant hidden cost. While the goal is to protect federal lands from the heavy energy and water demands of AI, the bill mandates a transition so fast that the environmental cleanup itself could become a chaotic and expensive scramble.

Digital Borders and Tribal Sovereignty

One clear boundary in the bill is the exclusion of tribal lands. Any land held in trust by the U.S. for an Indian Tribe or member is exempt from this ban. This creates a unique regulatory map: a data center could be prohibited on one side of a property line (federal land) but perfectly legal on the other (tribal land). While this respects tribal sovereignty, it might also shift the pressure of AI development toward these areas. For the average person, this bill signals a major shift in how the government views the 'physical' footprint of the internet, prioritizing land conservation over the rapid expansion of AI processing power.