This Act mandates a periodic review to adjust the automatic maximum life insurance coverage for servicemembers and veterans to keep pace with inflation.
Marilyn Strickland
Representative
WA-10
The Fairness for Servicemembers and their Families Act of 2025 mandates a periodic review to ensure that the automatic maximum life insurance coverage under SGLI and VGLI keeps pace with inflation. Starting in 2026, the Secretary must review the current coverage amount every five years against an inflation-adjusted benchmark based on the Consumer Price Index. This process provides Congress with regular guidance on maintaining the real value of these benefits for servicemembers and veterans.
The “Fairness for Servicemembers and their Families Act of 2025” aims to tackle a problem that affects anyone trying to plan for the future: inflation. Specifically, it focuses on making sure the maximum payout for Servicemembers Group Life Insurance (SGLI) and Veterans Group Life Insurance (VGLI) doesn't lose its real-world value over time.
This section of the bill establishes a mandatory, regular review of the maximum automatic coverage amount for SGLI and VGLI. Think of it this way: if the maximum coverage for a service member’s life insurance was set at $500,000 ten years ago, that half-million dollars buys significantly less today because the cost of everything—from housing to college tuition—has gone up. This bill is designed to stop that benefit erosion.
Starting January 1, 2026, and then every five years after that, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs must conduct a check-up. They will compare the current maximum coverage amount against a new figure calculated by taking a $500,000 baseline and adjusting it based on the average change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) over the previous five fiscal years. In short, they are calculating what $500,000 should be worth today to keep pace with the cost of living.
For service members and veterans—and more importantly, their families—this is a big deal. Life insurance is often the primary financial safety net when a tragedy occurs. If the maximum coverage is stuck at a number set years ago, the surviving spouse or children might receive a payout that can’t adequately cover modern expenses like a mortgage or tuition. This review process provides a necessary mechanism to ensure that the promise of the insurance benefit remains financially relevant.
For example, if a service member currently has the maximum automatic coverage, and inflation has been running hot, the review might show that the coverage should actually be closer to $600,000 to have the same purchasing power as the original $500,000 did. This structured review means Congress gets a clear, data-driven recommendation on how much the coverage needs to increase to keep up.
While this process is a huge step forward for transparency and accountability, there is one important nuance. After the Secretary calculates the inflation-adjusted target, they must report the findings to the House and Senate Committees on Veterans’ Affairs. The bill explicitly states that this report is intended as “guidance” for potential coverage boosts and does not mandate an increase. The actual decision to raise the maximum coverage still rests with Congress.
So, while the bill provides the necessary data and structure to make informed adjustments, it doesn't automatically trigger the raise. The benefit relies on Congress actually acting on the guidance. However, having a mandatory, data-driven report every five years puts consistent pressure on lawmakers to address the real-world value of these critical benefits, making it much harder for coverage to fall behind the economy.